AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

James Bryan

MATHSTAT · 4A · MATH10STATS. · MATH1600 · 04A · MATHC · MATH10 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will do the homework; expect .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and funnyClear grading criteriaStep-by-step when onTest heavy in calcRetakes and notecards in stats
  • Strong stats teacher with , and project finals.
  • Calc sections feel lecture-heavy and exam-driven; some students say he skips steps.
  • if and use office help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

As are common if you finish homework and , but and are not free.

Online evidence is one strong A story; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

, while calc moves faster and assumes more prior knowledge.

Most difficulty comments come from in-person calc and older stats sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

Some sections list attendance as mandatory and others as .

; several in-person reviews said yes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

About four in , and fair recovery options on tests.

The single online review is strongly positive; in-person support is high but not universal.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students mention , and grade adjustments when finals improve.

Format shift

In-person stats reviews describe more .

Workload

Moderate

56/100

Stats often has light MyMathLab homework, while .

Format shift

Online review did not stress workload; .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most call him clear, funny, and or confuse.

Format shift

Online praise is strong; harsh outliers.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and occasional projects or worksheets.

Format shift

; online review mainly stresses overall grading clarity.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews mostly praise clear, funny, step-by-step teaching in stats, with and .

Main concern

Calc students report , and occasional .

What students said

“One of the few professors I've had that actually knows how to teach a hard subject. .”
MATHSTAT
“ . & . & use half a sheet of paper as a notecard.”
MATH-10-STATS.
“ if you don't have prior knowledge of calculus. He skips steps and use mental calculations without explaining how he got it.”
04A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One glowing calc review , and helped a twice-failed student earn an A.

Main concern

Only one online review, so and workload details are sparse.

What students said

“Never had a math prof like him before. I took calc 1 with him in the spring and I passed my class with an A. (I failed my calc 1 class twice).”
04A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Stats exams are more student-friendly with notecards and retakes, while calc and finals.

Retake optionNotecard allowedProject final in statsExam-heavy calcPartial credit

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and sometimes a project final instead of a pure sit-down final.

Notecard allowedRetake optionProject finalPartial creditDrop lowest test
“ . & . & use half a sheet of paper as a notecard.”
MATH-10-STATS.
“gives good lectures does and 4 tests but and gives partial credit.”
MATH10

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the few professors I've had that actually knows how to teach a hard subject. and if you don't understand something.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews spanning 2011-2025, weighting recent detailed comments on teaching and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“One of the few professors I've had that actually knows how to teach a hard subject. .”

👍 Recommendation

82/100

“if you want to get a good grade and learn . .”

📝

68/100

“ . & . & use half a sheet of paper as a notecard.”

⚠️ Calc Caution

45/100

“ if you don't have prior knowledge of calculus. He skips steps and use mental calculations without explaining how he got it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • Hes funny & gives good handouts with examples.
  • His lectures (although long) were fun and quite educational.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • My overall grade was a 98%.
  • the grade is like 100% how you do on the exams.
  • and it .

Theme 3

❤️ About Care and Support

  • He cares about his students.
  • He is willing to help you learn, ask him questions in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across many years with consistent themes on teaching style and .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH106 reviews
04A2 reviews
4A2 reviews
MATHSTAT2 reviews
MATH-10-STATS.1 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH16001 review
MATHC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2