AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Alesia Patterson

PSYCH52825 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Prefer her online sections for clearer instruction; expect more busywork and slower support in the reported in-person summer course.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear grading criteriaGives good feedbackAmazing online lecturesSlow communication offlineHeavy discussions and finals
  • , and manageable projects.
  • The lone in-person review calls her an but , and lecture posts.
  • Grades cluster in the A/B range if you keep up with weekly work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Comments call her an and recent online grades include A and B+ with .

Both ; online grades look slightly stronger.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Online lectures feel easy to follow, though the , and a .

Online difficulty ratings are low; the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

while the in-person review says attendance was not mandatory.

Online is stricter on attendance than the reported in-person summer class.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

62/100

; the in-person student would not and warned others away.

Recommendation is strong online and negative in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students report , and .

Format shift

despite disliking the course logistics.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Online projects are light, but and a 100-plus question final.

Format shift

Workload looks lighter online than in the one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Online lectures and ; in-person communication and lecture posting drew criticism.

Format shift

Teaching quality is clearly stronger in the online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of projects, discussions, and a .

Format shift

and a long final more than online comments do.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person summer student said she is an easy grader but , and light on lectures while assigning many discussions and a .

Main concern

Responsiveness and lecture coverage were the main complaints.

What students said

“She was an , however she didn't reply to emails, took a long time to grade and didn't post more than one lectures.”
PSYCH52825

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students , and .

Main concern

, so you still need to stay present.

What students said

“ and direct with instruction. Lectures are smooth and to the point but not dry.”
PSYCH52825
“A very helpful professor and gives great material for us to learn.”
PSYCH52825

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not prove proctoring tools; the clearest exam detail is a .

Large final examDiscussion heavyProjectsClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

100 questions plus heavy weekly discussions.

100+ question finalFive discussions a weekTest heavy
“The final had more than a 100 questions she also posts 5 discussions a week.”
PSYCH52825

Online

Online reviews do not .

Clear grading criteriaProjects
“ . She is personable and .”
PSYCH52825

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and direct with instruction. Lectures are smooth and to the point but not dry.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews with separate online and in-person weighting. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Online Teaching

85/100

“Lectures are smooth and to the point but not dry. She gives lots of addition links/ info for additional clarification.”

⚖️

76/100

“She was an , however she didn't reply to emails, took a long time to grade.”

⚠️ Support Reliability

35/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are smooth and to the point but not dry.
  • gives great material for us to learn.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Exams

  • .
  • The final had more than a 100 questions.
  • she also posts 5 discussions a week.

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • She is personable and .
  • grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews with a and stability of the scores.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH528253 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values