AI Rate Professor

Music

Emily Wallace

MUSG14 · MUSIC10 · MUSG10 · MUSG51154 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Only take her if you like music history and can handle ; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough picky graderVery long lecturesLots of homework and journalsAccessible and caring for somePolarizing music history
  • Reviews and harsh-grader warnings.
  • , and picky written work.
  • An A is possible if you follow directions exactly, but many say it is not an easy A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Many As exist, but , and heavy writing make an A feel costly rather than easy.

In-person students more often call it an easy A; recent online reviews lean hard and unforgiving.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Long lectures, dense reading, journals that , and group work raise the intellectual and time load.

Online reviews emphasize challenge more than the smaller in-person set.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

Most online and , though a few sections mark it yes.

; in-person is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About 60 percent would take her again; supporters love her care while .

In-person recommendations are warmer; online opinion is sharply divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Repeated tough-grader tags, zeros for imperfect answers, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students report hours-long , and detailed papers.

Format shift

Online workload criticism is stronger and more frequent than in person.

Teaching experience

Average

66/100

Many praise knowledge, care, and accessibility, while others say lectures rush, over-explain vocabulary, or feel unsupportive.

Format shift

In-person teaching comments are steadier; online quality swings from gem to awful.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

, and group projects carry heavy weight alongside long quizzes and finals.

Format shift

Online comments stress journals and group work more; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more positive , and an easy A if you do the work, despite long lectures and .

Main concern

Lectures and .

What students said

“Overall easy A if you do the work and you will actually learn about music history.”
MUSG10
“I think Professor Wallace is great. If you follow the instructions on the .”
MUSG14

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews dominate and are highly polarized: some earn As and call her a gem, others report zeros for , and failure vibes.

Main concern

and long lectures are the biggest online complaints.

What students said

“If you're looking for an had, long detailed assignments.”
MUSG14
“Professor Wallace is great. ... She is one of few professors who care.”
MUSG14
“If you don't answer exactly the way she wants she won't hesitate to give you a zero.”
MUSG14

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes can be long and lecture-based; reviews do .

Long examsQuizzes from lecturesFinal project optionNo answer review after quizzesGroup project grades

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students say exams can be difficult and long but manageable if you watch lectures; .

Long examsLecture-based testsManageable with notes
“ and long but manageable if you watch her lectures.”
MUSG10
“ .”
MUSG14

Online

Online students mention quizzes and review of wrong answers, plus project-style finals.

Long quizzes and examsNo view of wrong answersLecture-based testsFinal project
“never lets you view the answers or even which questions ”
MUSIC10
“ upon weeks of preparing for”
MUSG14
“watch the lectures even if they're one hour long you will need them for the quiz”
MUSG10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're looking for an had, long detailed assignments. Not only that she's an extremely harsh grader.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews with heavy online sample and and care. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“Prof. Wallace was an absolute gem. and advocates for her students.”

🧱

28/100

“If you don't answer exactly the way she wants she won't hesitate to give you a zero.”

📚 Workload Overload

24/100

“Lectures are hours long. Doesn't care for students academic success.”

👍 When It Clicks

75/100

“Overall easy A if you do the work and you will actually learn about music history even if you think your not doing anything.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches clearly and .
  • Wallace would push hard to use certain vocabulary in .
  • lectures are interesting and complement the reading well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • had.
  • Overall easy A if you do the work.
  • she's an .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • one of the kindest and most considerate professors I've had.
  • She's also quick at responding to emails.
  • I wish I had listened to the negative reviews.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty recent-heavy reviews with rich detail and a despite polarization.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MUSG1412 reviews
MUSG103 reviews
MUSIC103 reviews
MUSG511542 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 9

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2