AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Deepa Radhakrishnan

MATH02 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Proceed with caution online; expect and keep messages ready for tech fixes.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast ResponderOrganized MaterialsUnclear LecturesHeavy HomeworkPolarized Reviews
  • Only two online reviews exist and they sharply disagree on lecture clarity and workload.
  • The , and recorded explanation videos.
  • The negative review says lectures need YouTube backup, discussion boards feel forced, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One student earned an A with low difficulty; the other found discussion and .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty ratings average moderate-low, but .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and the other mandatory, so .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One enthusiastic yes and one strong critique leave the take-again rate at about 50%.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; the other review focuses on workload rather than harsh point deductions.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of homework and volume.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and unclear mistake-filled lectures.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework, discussion boards, and dominant method.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online Math-02 splits between a student who found materials organized and and workload unreasonable.

Main concern

Lecture clarity and reviews.

What students said

“She answers messages super fast. All of her .”
Math-02
“Prepare to watch YouTube videos to understand her lectures. and she makes mistakes mid-equation”
Math-02

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and discussion boards but .

Test heavyDiscussion boardsRecorded lecture videos

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online assessments include tests and discussion boards; two reviews.

Test heavyDiscussion boards
“Discussion boards are difficult because the types of questions asked in the so it's hard to comply.”
Math-02
“The amount of work expected is unreasonable.”
Math-02

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Radhakrishnan is awesome. I don't get why someone gave a 1.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 online reviews with conflicting tones. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Polarized Quality

50/100

“Professor Radhakrishnan is awesome. I don't get why someone gave a 1.”

📚 Lecture Clarity

35/100

“Prepare to watch YouTube videos to understand her lectures.”

💬 Responsiveness

80/100

“She answers messages super fast. All of her .”

Theme 1

👍

  • She records videos explaining everything.
  • the few times there were bugs, I sent her a note and she replied within a few hours

Theme 2

⚠️

  • and she makes mistakes mid-equation rendering your notetaking useless.
  • The amount of work expected is unreasonable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent online reviews with opposite tones provide too little sample and consistency for a strong judgment.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

Math-022 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1