AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Grant Holder

CHEM02A · CHEM02B · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless you have no other chemistry option.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear lecturesUnhelpfulTough graderEmbarrasses studentsTest heavy
  • All three reviews rate quality at 1 with zero interest in retaking.
  • , and harsh in class interactions.
  • and homework make chemistry feel punishing rather than guided.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

One student earned an A, but and high difficulty mean an A still takes heavy effort.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Difficulty ratings near 5 and comments about rambling, test-heavy chemistry make the content feel brutal.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

At least one review states attendance was mandatory, with no signs of flexibility.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and repeated do-not-pick warnings leave no reason to enroll.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

scraped an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students report lots of homework and a test-heavy structure.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

, and humiliating when students ask questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Test-heavy tags and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person chemistry sections are described as , and unhelpful, with and heavy testing.

Main concern

and demeaning responses to student questions.

What students said

“TERRIBLE. Do not pick”
CHEM02B
“He is unhelpful and unclear. He just rambles about the subject.”
CHEM02A
“ and unhelpful with questions.”
CHEM02B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear central and demanding, with no student-friendly format described.

Test heavyIn-person exams

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Test heavyIn-person exams
“ ”
CHEM02B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“TERRIBLE. Do not pick”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching clarity and harsh classroom tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

12/100

“He is unhelpful and unclear. He just rambles about the subject.”

👎 Recommendation

5/100

“TERRIBLE. Do not pick”

😬 Classroom Climate

18/100

“Students have asked questions in class, and he makes them embarrassed and feel unintelligent.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and unhelpful with questions.
  • He just rambles about the subject.
  • He doesn't help you if you don't know the exact terms for chemistry.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • TERRIBLE. Do not pick
  • He tries to be an .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews spanning 2013-2025, but all are consistently negative and detailed enough to trust the pattern.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM02B2 reviews
CHEM02A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values