AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Danielle Prock

REGN15 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

rude treatment, harsh grading, and lack of support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderRude and unhelpfulTest heavyNo supportParticipation matters
  • All three reviews rate quality at 1 with and little academic support.
  • Exams are scenario-based and high-stakes; study guides are described as vague.
  • Attendance and participation are mandatory, and students report being pushed to drop or feeling set up to fail.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Reported grades are C and F with and .

All evidence is from three in-person Regn-15 reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Students rate difficulty at 5 and describe heavy lectures, participation pressure, and hard scenario exams.

All difficulty comments are in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and notes that participation matters.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and unanimous quality-1 reviews urging others not to enroll.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

and mid-semester advice to drop.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and high-stakes testing are repeatedly mentioned.

Format shift

Workload evidence is in person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students say lectures can be inaccurate, support is missing, and the tone is rude or dismissive.

Format shift

All teaching comments .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Test-heavy structure with scenario exams and vague study guides drives most of the grade pressure.

Format shift

coursework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Students describe arrogant, unhelpful , and a judgmental classroom climate.

Main concern

, and demeaning feedback that leaves students feeling belittled.

What students said

“Arrogant, rude, and unhelpful when it came to asking for help and .”
Regn-15
“No interest in teaching, only to judge and belittle”
Regn-15
“ and do ur research.”
Regn-15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are scenario-based and high pressure, with little clarity or support around prep.

Scenario-based exams50-question testsVague study guidesTest heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe scenario exams of about 50 questions plus vague study guides and .

Scenario-based exams50-question testsVague study guides
“Study guides for .”
Regn-15
“test are 50 questions that are scenarios based, participation does matters.!!!”
Regn-15

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Arrogant, rude, and unhelpful when it came to asking for help and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews with fully consistent negative themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

10/100

“No interest in teaching, only to judge and belittle”

⚖️

8/100

“The failure.”

📝

28/100

“test are 50 questions that are scenarios based, participation does matters.!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Climate

  • Arrogant, rude, and unhelpful
  • Lectures were not always accurate
  • Professor Danielle has no manners, with a rude attitude

Theme 2

📈 About Support and Grades

  • No guidance or support
  • The good things I did were not acknowledged.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only three highly consistent negative reviews with strong detail, but the small sample limits confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

Regn-153 reviews

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values