AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Brian Johnson

ENG13 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

Avoid this professor; students describe a and poor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderLecture HeavyNon-ResponsiveHeavy WorkloadHarsh Grading
  • Every review rates quality at 1 with .
  • Students report , and .
  • , and homework make the course punishing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Grades include F, C-, and , so an A is extremely unlikely.

and super hard; in-person evidence is mostly tags plus withdrawals.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Students , and difficulty ratings near 5 as overwhelming.

and workload; online also complains about hour-long YouTube lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Most reviews mark attendance as not mandatory, but .

Online has mixed attendance reports; as not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Zero take-again support and .

; in-person reviews still all rate quality 1 and dropped.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

and graded-by-few-things feedback.

Format shift

Online students spell out harsh grading; .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Lots of homework, so , and lecture-heavy expectations stack up.

Format shift

Online ; and reading.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students call him non-responsive, unhelpful, and the .

Format shift

Detailed teaching complaints are online; in-person reviews are sparse but still rate quality 1.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Tags and comments center on papers, homework, and few graded .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and homework; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are thin on narrative but share the same 1 and papers, and both students dropped.

Main concern

and paper load with multiple withdrawals.

What students said

“ , So many papers”
ENG13
“ ”
ENG13

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

long third-party , and students calling it the worst class they took.

Main concern

No reliable instructor communication and .

What students said

“ . He does not care”
ENG13
“ . very harsh”
ENG13
“ . super hard”
ENG13

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment , and few graded items.

Few Graded ItemsPaper HeavyHomework Heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; evidence points to heavy papers and reading instead.

So Many PapersLots of Homework
“ , So many papers”
ENG13

Online

Online reviews ; students focus on harsh grading and heavy work.

Graded by Few ThingsHomework Heavy
“ . very harsh”
ENG13
“ . super hard”
ENG13

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . He does not care”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (3 online, 2 in and poor-support themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

5/100

“ . very harsh”

📚 Overwhelming Workload

18/100

“If you enjoy having to watch hour(s) long YouTube lectures by random people on the course work, this is your class.”

📉 Teaching Quality Collapse

10/100

“ literally regurgitates the same non-helpful information he provides in his modules.”

⚔️

10/100

“ . super hard”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • No set zoom hour for communication
  • He does not care

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • . very harsh
  • . super hard

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • So many papers
  • Lots of homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent reviews are fully consistent on quality 1 and harsh workload, but .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG135 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1