AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Anthony Farao

AGRI10 · AGAB08 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if ; if you can self-navigate messy online modules.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized modulesSelf-teach requiredCopy-paste contentHelpful when responsiveOnline only sample
  • Only three recent online reviews; no in-person evidence.
  • and poor guidance; one praises tech help.
  • All three earned A grades despite frustration, so grades may not equal good teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

All three reported A grades, but students still describe high friction and search-heavy modules.

All evidence is online-only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty stems less from content depth and more from disorganization and weak guidance.

All evidence is online-only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Attendance flags differ by review and .

Online-only sample with mixed mandatory/optional notes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

Only one of ; the other two explicitly warn others away.

Recommendation evidence is entirely from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

Students still finished with A grades despite frustration, suggesting grading is not the .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Work itself is not described as huge, but scavenging poorly structured modules inflates time cost.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Majority describe no real guidance and filler content, with one positive tech-support outlier.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews discuss module work rather than exams; assessment details remain sparse.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one student got solid tech support, while two found modules chaotic and unhelpful.

Main concern

Poor organization and module-only answers leave students hunting for information.

What students said

“the complete lack of organization within this and pasted material”
AGRI-10
“Great online instructor I struggle with tech and he was there to help”
AGAB-08
“The modules are not structured well. Much time was spent searching through multiple modules for information.”
AGAB-08

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online comments ; focus is on module structure.

“if and do.”
AGRI-10
“There is no actual guidence. Thankful for google.”
AGAB-08

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He was the most difficult professor I have had to deal with. I took his online course and the complete lack of organization within this ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 online-only reviews with mixed quality claims. Credibility rating: Low.

🧩 Module Chaos

25/100

“the complete lack of organization within this and pasted material that was not relevant to that weeks work.”

🧭 Self-Guide Required

30/100

“His constant response to not understanding something in a module is to refer back to the module.”

🛠️ Tech Help Upside

70/100

“Great online instructor I struggle with tech and he was there to help”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great online instructor I struggle with tech and he was there to help
  • There is no actual guidence. Thankful for google.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He was the most difficult professor I have had to deal with.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Design

  • straight up copy and pasted material that was not relevant to that weeks work
  • The modules are not structured well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 recent online reviews with no in-person sample and conflicting quality signals limit confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AGAB-082 reviews
AGRI-101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values