AI Rate Professor

Art History

Tricia Cooper

PHOT33 · ART02 · ART068092 · ART1959 · ART01 · PHOTO33 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
82.76%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you like art history writing and and readings.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGet ready to readLots of writingGives good feedbackPassionateClear grading criteria
  • Art history and and writing more than pure exams.
  • In person feels engaging and story-driven; and papers.
  • Most students earn As if they keep up, though a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Most students report As if they complete weekly writings and .

Both formats yield easy As for writers; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Concepts are approachable, but and multi-hundred-word weekly writing create real work.

and self-taught; in person feels easier with lively lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online attendance is often optional, while .

Online is flexible; in person more often requires showing up and bans phones.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Strong majority praise passion and fairness, with a .

In person is almost uniformly positive; online is mostly positive with a few harsh outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and many easy As, though a .

Format shift

Online has the ; in as fair and supportive.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Weekly discussions, artwork analyses, long midterm and .

Format shift

Online reviews stress reading and papers most; in person still has quizzes and papers but feels lighter.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Students praise passion, stories, and lectures.

Format shift

In person teaching shines; online .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades rest mainly on discussions, written analyses, museum or gallery papers, and some multiple-choice tests.

Format shift

Both formats are writing-heavy; online has more Canvas discussions and fewer live lectures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person classes are high-energy and passionate with , and memorable lectures.

Main concern

Attendance and phone rules can feel strict even when content is manageable.

What students said

“Lectures are always high energy and fun.”
ART02
“As long as you pay attention in class and put effort into the quizzes and .”
ART01
“Just do her work and no doubt youll pass.”
PHOTO33

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections rely on , and long papers with limited live lectures.

Main concern

feedback.

What students said

“a looot of homework and . the powerpoints have like 60 pages of text plus articles.”
ART01
“NO instructor lectures/reviews/walk-throughs. Materials teaches .”
ART02
“2-3 assignments a week which are usually photo analysis ranging from 300-500 words and a discussion.”
PHOT33

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment mixes short writings, unit tests, and .

Multiple choice testsDiscussion boardsMuseum paperFinal paperPhoto analyses

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In , and papers with little detail on lockdown tools.

QuizzesWriting assignmentsParticipationMuseum trip
“There is a discussion board once a week, 350 word count, a 450 word analysis on 2 artworks, and a .”
ART02
“put effort into the quizzes and .”
ART01

Online

, and long papers; proctoring is not clearly proven.

Canvas discussionsMultiple choice testsMuseum paperGallery paperSelf-paced modules
“mostly made up of 350 word discussion board, 450 word analysis between 2 artworks and a ”
ART02
“a 1400 word museum paper midterm and 1500 word final paper analyzing different styles of art.”
ART02

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Cooper is a real gem! Loved her class. Her passion for the arts and photography had me wanting to learn more.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews across online and in-person art and photography courses. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Writing and Reading Load

36/100

“a looot of homework and . the powerpoints have like 60 pages of text plus articles.”

🎯 Teaching Passion

84/100

“She loves her job and can easily attract you to the subject.”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“ .”

📝

78/100

“She always gives you good feedback and for the most part the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are always high energy and fun
  • she made me really enjoy it
  • No instructor lectures/reviews/walk-throughs

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • easy if , and writing A LOT
  • As long as you show up and do the work she assigns(a very small amount) you will pass with an A
  • Why is an as if she were an English professor

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • kind to her students, and
  • and caring of her students
  • cares about her students and wants them to pass!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine reviews from 2017-2025 give consistent writing-heavy themes across online and in-person formats.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART0213 reviews
ART017 reviews
PHOT336 reviews
ART0680921 review
ART19591 review
Show 1 more courses
PHOTO331 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 5 · A 16

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1