AI Rate Professor

English

Shelby Scoffield

ENGLISH · ENG301 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you want a very hard writing boot camp and ; most students advise avoiding.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderVague FeedbackHeavy Paper LoadPoor CommunicationEnglish Hazing
  • Most students call her a revisions.
  • and .
  • One recent student found the rigor constructive if .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

and withdrawal grades, and comments about harsh paper standards make an A feel nearly out of reach.

Both the online review and ; no easy-A evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and high difficulty ratings show a challenging writing course.

Online and in-person both report high difficulty; .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

, so flexibility is relatively high.

as no or not provided; online also says not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

; and poor communication.

The single online review is strongly negative; in-person is mixed but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and complaints that .

Format shift

counter-evidence.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and long assignments dominate the experience.

Format shift

; online focuses on perfection pressure.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Most call communication and ; one student values the constructive push.

Format shift

Online is wholly negative; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment centers on drafts, papers, and peer-partner work rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats discuss papers and feedback; exams are not described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly describe tough , and uncaring tone, with one constructive-hard take.

Main concern

Paper load and late.

What students said

“This isn't a writing class, this is english hazing.”
ENG301
“I think Ms. Scoffield pushes you to your limits and is very hard in a constructive way.”
ENGLISH
“ so that we couldnt learn from our mistakes.”
ENG301

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The sole online review calls her a and poor communicator who scolds the whole class instead of helping individuals.

Main concern

and lack of personal help on drafts.

What students said

“She was a and an awful communicator. and would get after the entire class instead of talking to individual students.”
ENG301

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams; assessment is paper- and draft-driven.

Paper HeavyDraft FeedbackPeer Grading

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments focus on papers and .

So Many PapersPeer GradingDraft Cycles
“She tells you to work off of feedback and be specific, yet gives the most vague generalized response that isn't personal until the .”
ENG301
“Everything was about your partner. Your partner had to grade your work and so on.”
ENGLISH

Online

; and feedback quality.

Paper Feedback
“She just wanted the figure out the answer to my questions.”
ENG301

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This isn't a writing class, this is english hazing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews with . Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

18/100

“She was a and an awful communicator.”

💬

25/100

“ so that we couldnt learn from our mistakes.”

📚 Heavy Papers

22/100

“Her work is not that difficult if you have a good work ethic .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • She was a and an awful communicator.
  • so that we couldnt learn from our mistakes.
  • My sister and I both took this class and she gave us the exact same grade and feedback.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • This isn't a writing class, this is english hazing.
  • If you genuinely listen to her feedback, she teaches genuine skills in how to think deeper.

Theme 3

❤️ About Care & Tone

  • She was very uncaring.
  • When she did help me or other students, it didn't feel like she cared.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews from 2014-2024; tone is consistent but sample is small and detail varies.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG3013 reviews
ENGLISH2 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1