AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Elda Bautista

MATH20A · MATH25 · MATHC6108 · MATH20 · MATH1600 · C · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you already handle math well, never miss class, and can keep up with a fast lecture pace.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast-paced lecturesAccent clarity issuesLots of homeworkStudy guide aligned examsTough grade book setup
  • Most students struggle with pace, explanation clarity, and understanding lectures despite some thorough examples.
  • One strong positive review says exams match study guides and extra credit can rescue weaker math students.
  • Grading structure complaints include many tiny categories that heavily affect the overall grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

A grades are possible with attendance, homework, study guides, and extra credit, but most students describe hard grading and grade-book traps.

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Fast pacing and limited clear explanation make the math content feel difficult, especially for students who need more practice time.

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance is repeatedly marked mandatory, and missing lecture is said to hurt because content moves quickly.

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

38/100

Most would not recommend her for struggling math students, but one student strongly praised the study guides and extra credit path.

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and a harsh tiny-category grade book make high grades hard to protect.

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of homework, required attendance, and constant practice expectations create a heavy load for math courses.

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

A few students find examples thorough or fun, but many report unclear explanations, pace problems, and unhelpful responses to questions.

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and many small graded categories matter a lot, while exams that mirror study guides also drive outcomes.

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math sections are mostly critical of fast teaching, accent-related comprehension issues, and hard grading, with one student praising fun classes, study guides, and extra credit.

Main concern

Fast lectures and unclear explanations leave weaker math students behind quickly.

What students said

“She teaches things really fast. If you're really good at math, you'll be fine.”
MATH25
“HER EXAMS ARE EXACTLY LIKE THE STUDY GUIDES!”
MATH20A
“she definitely makes a lot of and she grades hard.”
MATH1600

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are not described as proctored online tools; the friendliest detail is that exams closely follow study guides with extra credit available.

Exams match study guidesExtra creditHomework-heavy categories

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and extra credit can boost scores, with no clear proctoring software details.

Exams match study guidesExtra creditIn-person lecture pace
“HER EXAMS ARE EXACTLY LIKE THE STUDY GUIDES! I AM HORRIBLE WITH MATH BUT THANKS TO THE EXTRA CREDIT AND STUDY GUIDES I GOT A'S!”
MATH20A
“Missing lecture WILL hurt.”
MATHC6108

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're really good at math, you'll be fine. If math isn't your forte and you're like me who needs time/lots of practice to understand a concept, don't take her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews spanning 2015-2023. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“I couldn't understand her not because of her accent but because she didn't explain things clearly.”

📝

70/100

“HER EXAMS ARE EXACTLY LIKE THE STUDY GUIDES!”

⚖️

32/100

“she definitely makes a lot of and she grades hard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches things really fast.
  • She goes through her example problems fairly thoroughly, but at pace in which you have no room to doze off.
  • She had trouble explaining her work and at times made mistakes herself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Save your self a grade.
  • SHE IS NOT A HELPFUL TEACHER WOULDNT TAKE HER AGAIN
  • THANKS TO THE EXTRA CREDIT AND STUDY GUIDES I GOT A'S!

Theme 3

🏫 About Attendance

  • Missing lecture WILL hurt.
  • to absolutely attend class with .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Six in-person reviews from 2015 to 2023 provide some detail but a small sample and mixed age of comments limit confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

C1 review
MATH16001 review
MATH201 review
MATH20A1 review
MATH251 review
Show 1 more courses
MATHC61081 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1