AI Rate Professor

Communication

Melissa Amarllisa

COMM04 · COMM05 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Average online COMM instructor with ; if you can handle group work and vague prompts.

Best fit · Effort For RewardVague AssignmentsParticipation MattersGroup ProjectsLots of HomeworkMixed Grading Clarity
  • Both reviews are online COMM courses with middling quality ratings of 3.
  • One student got an A ; the and case studies manageable.
  • Workload and clarity feel inconsistent across sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

One student earned an A despite vague criteria, but , and .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Difficulty ratings span 2 to 4 with reading, discussions, tests, and group case studies at a standard college level.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

COMM04 listed attendance as mandatory and participation matters across tags.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and one did not say; both quality scores sit at a flat 3.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

An A is possible, but and .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

projects, and a paper keep the load moderate.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Students rate quality at 3 with mixed clarity on assignments and criteria.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly discussions, end-of-week tests, group case studies, and a .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online COMM04/COMM05 mix of vague grading and , and a paper.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and .”
COMM04
“there are . There is a and have to work on a case study with your chosen group.”
COMM05

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Weekly tests plus a group case study and paper; .

Weekly TestsCase StudyPaper

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

, and a paper; proctoring not mentioned.

Weekly TestsGroup Case StudyPaper
“There is a and have to work on a case study with your chosen group. Also a paper”
COMM05

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 online reviews spanning 2020-2023. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“ and .”

📚 Workload Pattern

45/100

“there are . There is a and have to work on a case study with your chosen group.”

👍

50/100

“Yes”

Theme 1

📝

  • and .
  • Get ready to read

Theme 2

📅 About Weekly Rhythm

  • work on a case study with your chosen group

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two online reviews from 2020 and 2023 with moderate detail and mixed tags.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMM041 review
COMM051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values