AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Mark Deering

PHIL12 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you must take Phil-12; one review paints , heavy work, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing LecturesLots of HomeworkLecture HeavyUnclear GradingNot Philosophy
  • Single in-person Phil-12 review rates quality 2 and difficulty 5.
  • Student says content felt like math, not philosophy.
  • Lectures and as nonsensical.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Difficulty rated 5 with lots of homework and a .

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Maximum difficulty rating and content described as math-like and .

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

as not mandatory.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Quality 2, no take-again yes, and strongly negative comment about lectures and grading.

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Student says the and quality feels low.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of homework and .

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Lectures make no sense and content felt unrelated to philosophy.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Lots of ; exams are not clearly described.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person Phil-12 felt like a math class with senseless lectures and an .

Main concern

and grading that do not match philosophy expectations.

What students said

“This class had absolutely nothing to do with philosophy. It felt more like a math class. The lectures make no sense and neither does the .”
Phil-12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews ; only that .

“The lectures make no sense and neither does the .”
Phil-12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class had absolutely nothing to do with philosophy. It felt more like a math class. The lectures make no sense and neither does the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“The lectures make no sense and neither does the .”

🔥 Course Difficulty

15/100

“It felt more like a math class.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“Lots of homework”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures make no sense
  • Lecture heavy
  • absolutely nothing to do with philosophy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • neither does the
  • Lots of homework
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 5

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Single 2023 review with limited detail and no corroborating opinions.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Phil-121 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1