AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Shauna Bennett

ACTG04A · ACTTG52 · ACTG32 · ACTG52 · ACTG31 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

; only consider in-person if you can self-pace a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsive OnlineSelf-Taught AccountingHeavy HomeworkFair In PersonHard to Reach
  • Online sections often have and near-zero instructor contact
  • but and textbook pacing
  • Many online students say they taught

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible mainly by grinding homework and textbook work on .

Online evidence stresses self-teaching for grades; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Accounting content plus fast fall-behind pacing and instruction.

Both formats rate difficulty high; online adds zero guidance.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

as and mandatory in others with little instructional value online.

Online comments mix mandatory and optional; in-person often not required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students warn against her, especially online, due to unresponsiveness and self-teaching.

Online reviews strongly say do not take; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

In-person students call her a fair or ; online work is mostly auto-graded with .

Format shift

; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework, reading, and .

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

26/100

Online students describe total absence and unprofessionalism; in-person teaching is only average-to-good.

Format shift

Online quality near floor; in-person quality 3-5.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and textbook work dominate, with tests also noted as important especially in person.

Format shift

; online centers on platform homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

fair grading and passable with textbook work, but and .

Main concern

Lots of and .

What students said

“HW is super time consuming but she is a .”
ACTG04A
“There's a lot of homework but she does try to help her students. as well”
ACTG04A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report missing lectures, no PowerPoints, ignored emails and calls, and learning entirely alone through auto-graded platforms.

Main concern

Instructor absence and total lack of guidance or timely responses.

What students said

“I was learning on my own since or powerpoints were posted.”
ACTG-31
“ , no zoom meetings, almost a miracle to get a hold of her.”
ACTTG52
“Was completely absent the 1st 2 months of class.”
ACTG52

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize homework and tests but .

Test heavyAuto-graded homeworkTextbook-based

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not detail closed-book or .

Test heavyTextbook follow-along
“Follow along in the textbook and you will pass, you just cant slack off or youll fall behind quick.”
ACTG04A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or ; .

Auto-graded platform workQuiz grade issues
“Everything gets automatically graded through McGraw Hill.”
ACTTG52
“Tried reaching her through emails, phone calls, and leaving voicemails and ”
ACTG32

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! I was learning on my own since or powerpoints were posted.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (4 online, 2 in person), highlighting . Credibility rating: Medium.

📵 Online Absence

20/100

“Was completely absent the 1st 2 months of class.”

📚 Self-Teaching Reality

25/100

“Youre literally learning on your own.”

⚖️

70/100

“HW is super time consuming but she is a .”

👎 Recommendation Gap

28/100

“HORRIBLE professor!”

Theme 1

📵 About Online Communication

  • She is very hard to react. I emailed her and texted her personal number multiple times and did not receive a response back.
  • Tried reaching her through emails, phone calls, and leaving voicemails... none of the emails or call were ever returned.
  • almost a miracle to get a hold of her

Theme 2

📖 About Workload & Learning

  • Be prepared to learn on your own.
  • HW is super time consuming
  • Lots of homework but she does try to help her students

Theme 3

🏫

  • I enjoyed her class more than Stapletons course.
  • Overall a good class and
  • as well

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed reviews from 2020-2023 with strong format contrast; small sample but consistent online complaints.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ACTG04A2 reviews
ACTG-311 review
ACTG321 review
ACTG521 review
ACTTG521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1