AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kimberly Mendoza

MATH25 · MATH80 · MATH62 · MATH60 · MATHC1629 · MATH10 · MATHC1908 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
15.38%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

; find another math professor unless you can learn fully from the book alone.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes not teachLots of homeworkTest heavyTough graderUnclear lectures
  • Vast majority of students say she copies notes without explaining and .
  • Homework and and slow or .
  • Two positive outliers exist but are heavily downvoted and clash with the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Grades skew low with drops and D/F reports; students say material is unreviewed and .

Both online and ; rare A claims conflict with majority tone.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Difficulty stems less from deep theory and and tests.

Consistent across online and in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

In-person lateness is tracked strictly and absences can cost homework; many .

In-person rules are harshest; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Roughly 15% would take again; and .

Both formats strongly negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

, and grade disputes appear often.

Format shift

Harsh tone is shared online and in person.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

, and test-heavy loads dominate reviews.

Format shift

Both formats report excessive homework.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant theme , and little help; rare praise is heavily downvoted.

Format shift

Online and in-person agree on poor instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Test-heavy tags and .

Format shift

Online and and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly say she writes problems without , and enforces strict lateness rules.

Main concern

Board , and .

What students said

“DOES NOT TEACH! She only copies work from her notebook onto the board”
MATHC1908
“You ”
MATHC1629
“ ”
MATH25

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online math sections are described as , and no real teaching.

Main concern

Self-teaching and .

What students said

“her lectures where just notes that I NEVER understood”
MATH10
“ ”
MATH60
“You mine as well just buy yourself a math book and do problems on your own”
MATH80

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students report many tests with unreviewed material and no makeups; .

Test heavyNo makeup testsUnreviewed test materialPop quizzes mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and excessive homework; formal proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Test heavyPop quizzesStrict latenessHeavy MML homework
“Gives tons of homework. ”
MATHC1908
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
MATH25

Online

Online reviews describe many tests, no makeups, and ; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Lots of testsNo makeup testsStrict homework zeros
“There . If you don't do the ”
MATH10
“ ”
MATH60

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The absolute worst teacher I have ever had at Merced College. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews across online and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

18/100

“DOES NOT TEACH! She only copies work from her notebook onto the board”

📚

12/100

“You . (MML) Its ridiculous”

👎

12/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • her lectures where just notes that I NEVER understood
  • she doesnt teach anything at all
  • When she lectures, it's as if she doesn't want to be there at all

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Tests

  • homework varies from 30 problems to 60+
  • There

Theme 3

⚠️ Minority Positive Notes

  • gives multiple of opportunities she literally lets you redo the inclass worksheets
  • and helps you if you need help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

13 reviews with strong negative consensus and detailed complaints; small sample and two conflicting positives keep credibility from High.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH804 reviews
MATH102 reviews
MATHC16292 reviews
MATHC19082 reviews
MATH251 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH601 review
MATH621 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 2