AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Kirsty Brace

CDLV01 · CLDV04 · CLDV07 · CLDV7LAB · CLDV05 · CLDV01 · CLDV07L · CLDV09 · CLDV38 · PSYCH09 · CLDV65D · CLDV7 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
52.38%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want an engaging Child Development mentor; avoid online unless you can handle disorganization and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirational in personOnline disorganizedTough lab graderCaring personalityLots of reading
  • , and student-centered.
  • Online sections draw repeated complaints about , and .
  • Lab and practicum courses grade hard and , while many students still report As.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earn As, but and some sections feel picky, so an A still costs real effort.

Online reviews mention easy assignments mixed with messy exams; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, but , and uneven organization raise the challenge.

Online difficulty is driven by confusion more than concepts; and expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

34/100

, and lab reviews stress being present to pass.

and lecture sections; online attendance is less central but deadlines are strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Strong praise for warnings and polarized take-again answers.

In-person recommendation is high; online recommendation is low.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some classes feel generous while labs and .

Format shift

Online grades can still be As despite chaos; .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Expect , and lab work rather than a light weekly load.

Format shift

Online reading and Canvas tasks pile up; .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Students split between calling her amazing and and online.

Format shift

delivery.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and participation rather than one pure focus.

Format shift

Online leans on reading-based quizzes and Canvas work; and in-class tasks.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students often call her wonderful, hilarious, and inspirational, though and mandatory presence.

Main concern

Labs and some and attendance, with occasional slow responses.

What students said

“This is by far the greatest professor I have ever had and will ever had.”
CLDV07
“great teacher with great personality but grades super hard and specific about how she wants thing”
CLDV07L
“ . Brace is amazing and she is all about her students.”
CLDV04

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report outdated materials, confusing instructions, sloppy exams, passive-aggressive replies, and .

Main concern

Course structure and and .

What students said

“I would not recommend this professor especially for an online class.”
CDLV01
“Course was a mess. Awful organization. Low amount of feedback.”
CLDV01
“ . "No answer text provided"!”
CLDV01

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams exist and are often reading-based, but students also flag sloppy multiple-choice items and mismatched coverage.

Sloppy multiple choiceReading-based quizzesSome open-book online quizzesModule-mixed questions

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, including some open-book online quiz chances, but do not clearly prove a .

Open-book online quizzesMultiple attempts mentionedRandom in-class assignmentsClear expectations in stronger sections
“Test and Quizes are open book and online with a 3 chance to get the .”
PSYCH09
“Her exams are sloppy with only 1 answer out of 4 inputted on multiple choice and questions from different modules.”
CLDV01

Online

Online exams are frequently criticized as sloppy, poorly worded, or covering material not taught, while .

Sloppy examsReading and lecture quizzesVocabulary on testsConfusing question wording
“ been covered in class.”
CDLV01
“Her exams are sloppy with only 1 answer out of 4 inputted on multiple choice and questions from different modules.”
CLDV01
“Our quiz and and .”
CDLV01

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is by far the greatest professor I have ever had and will ever had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting the and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 In-Person Inspiration

80/100

“She is WONDERFUL! if you have personal issues going on and really prepares you for when you are going to become a preschool teacher.”

⚠️ Online Chaos

25/100

“Course was a mess. Awful organization. Low amount of feedback.”

📝

40/100

“great teacher with great personality but grades super hard and specific about how she wants thing”

👍 Split Recommendation

52/100

“I would not recommend this professor especially for an online class.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her excitement for the class and child development is so visible
  • She make learning fun
  • She shares her life experiences rather than just repeat what is on the slides

Theme 2

💻 About Online Course Setup

  • Much of the material, supposed to be open source, was outdated or
  • Confusion with assignment instructions and exams

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • . I didnt learn much :/
  • She is a because
  • The class was a ton of work but I am so glad I got the

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • shes all about her students and their success
  • Brace is an awesome professor
  • She's an amazing person

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

27 detailed reviews span 2014-2022 with consistent online-versus-in-person patterns and rich qualitative detail.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CLDV095 reviews
CLDV014 reviews
CDLV013 reviews
CLDV043 reviews
CLDV073 reviews
Show 7 more courses
CLDV07L3 reviews
CLDV051 review
CLDV381 review
CLDV65D1 review
CLDV71 review
CLDV7LAB1 review
PSYCH091 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

14

A 11 · A- 3

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2