AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kristen Rieg

MATH4A · MATH10STATS · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Strong pick for stats if you will do the homework; expect a busy workload more than a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear ExplanationsLots Of HomeworkAccessible Outside ClassCalculator TipsCheat Sheet Friendly
  • and useful notes for non-math students
  • , but due dates and late grace soften the load
  • and feel fair if you keep up with work

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic if you stay on track with homework and use notes, but procrastination and volume block free As.

Online and ; one online student said they could have earned an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Students who dislike and calculator tips make stats manageable.

Both formats emphasize clarity; summer online felt faster but still doable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while others do not, so flexibility depends on the term.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most , and fair support.

Recent MATH10STATS reviews are strongly positive; older MATH4A is mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

64/100

Late grace and fair criteria help, though she may not always round and some call her a .

Format shift

; one online review tagged tough grader.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and projects are the main complaint across sections.

Format shift

Heavy load appears in both online and in-person MATH10STATS comments.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

and strong accessibility outweigh a few older clarity complaints.

Format shift

Recent in-person and online stats feedback is warmer than older MATH4A notes.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework, quizzes, projects, and a focus.

Format shift

; online also cites many assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person she is widely praised as , and and notes that help on tests and projects.

Main concern

and paper load; older MATH4A comments are more mixed.

What students said

“She's such an amazing Statistics professor and .”
MATH10STATS
“she lets you have a cheat sheet front and back for the ”
MATH10STATS
“She gives grace with late assignments but it was a lot of work.”
MATH10STATS

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online stats students mostly like her explanations and long due dates, though some report heavy work and .

Main concern

Assignment volume and some non-counting work can feel like busywork.

What students said

“she is good at explaining how to do the homework, and provides a bunch of easy hacks for the calculator”
MATH10STATS
“Alot of work, some of .”
MATH10STATS

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and a front-and-back cheat sheet, with calculator help emphasized.

Cheat Sheet AllowedCalculator SupportNotes Helpful For TestsFew Exams Plus Projects

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, students report cheat sheets, review days, and notes that map well to exams and projects.

Cheat Sheet AllowedReview Class DayNotes For Tests And Projects
“she lets you have a cheat sheet front and back for the ”
MATH10STATS
“provides notes that will be super beneficial for the test, project, and quizzes.”
MATH10STATS

Online

Online comments do not detail proctoring; and overall manageability.

Homework Focused Prep
“provides a bunch of easy hacks for the calculator to get through the .”
MATH10STATS

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I am not good at math at all but she made the material very easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting clarity, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯

76/100

“I am not good at math at all but she made the material very easy to understand.”

📚

32/100

“She gives grace with late assignments but it was a lot of work.”

📝 Student-Friendly Exams

78/100

“she lets you have a cheat sheet front and back for the ”

👍

78/100

“AMAZING TEACHER! I would so ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and calculator steps clearly
  • No question is a dumb question

Theme 2

📈 About Workload And Grades

  • Lots of homework and papers
  • Could have gotten an easy A without procrastinating

Theme 3

🧮 About Exams And Tools

  • Cheat sheet front and back allowed
  • , and quizzes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

10 reviews with recent detailed MATH10STATS comments, but sample size is moderate and older MATH4A feedback is sparse.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH10STATS8 reviews
MATH4A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1