AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Andrea Cruthird

CLDV04 · CLVD01 · CLDV01 · CDLV214 · CLDV37 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Skip if you want light workload or ; expect heavy papers and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardToo much work for creditsTough graderUnresponsiveGroup projectsSo many papers
  • Heavy writing and group work for low-credit courses
  • a few say chill and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Several students still earn As, but , and picky deductions.

Online and in-person both report time-heavy work; As appear mostly in in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is often called easy or skippable book-wise, but volume of writing and .

Both formats describe simple and group tasks.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory and .

; in-person reviews mostly say mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

29/100

and most comments warn about workload, attitude, or weak teaching.

Both formats lean negative; only a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tags and comments frequently say tough or and format deductions.

Format shift

Online review stresses picky deductions; certain items.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated complaints of , and too much work for 2 units.

Format shift

Both online and in-person emphasize heavy writing and group projects.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Average quality is low; students often call her unresponsive, unapproachable, or inconsistent.

Format shift

In-person reviews dominate and are mostly critical; one older night class was positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and participation rather than big exams.

Format shift

Neither .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, mandatory participation, and unapproachable or rude instruction, with a minority calling her chill.

Main concern

Workload feels high for units and teaching quality is inconsistent or negative.

What students said

“I find that the class is easy but .”
CLDV37
“She is unapproachable, unresponsive, and unfamiliar with the material she is teaching.”
CLVD01
“She's rude. and unclear.”
CLDV04

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One , and picky grading for a 2-credit class.

Main concern

Slow responses and .

What students said

“ so detailed and . The group projects feel pointless. This class has too much work for a 2 credit course.”
CLDV37

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and projects; .

Paper heavyGroup projectsClear essay outlines

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and presentations more than formal exams.

EssaysGroup projectsPresentation
“There are like four or . and a solo presentation.”
CLDV01

Online

; assessment is assignment and paper heavy.

So many papersGroup projects
“ , and asking for apa format even when it is unnecessary.”
CLDV37

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As a 2 unit course, I wouldn't expect to put the amount of work I do in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting workload, grading, and mixed teaching quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Overload

28/100

“This class has too much work for a 2 credit course.”

📝

32/100

“ and unclear.”

👎 Low Recommendation

29/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • So many papers

Theme 2

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Instruction is brief and inconsistent
  • Unapproachable, unresponsive
  • She talks to you like an adult

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • You will pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews from 2016-2022 with mixed detail and mostly consistent workload and .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CLDV042 reviews
CLDV372 reviews
CDLV2141 review
CLDV011 review
CLVD011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1