AI Rate Professor

Sociology

James Riley

SOC01A · SOC101 · SOC1 · SOC01 · S0C010 · HMSV42 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Worth it if you will attend every day, join discussion, and as ; avoid if you need modern LMS structure.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringParticipation HeavyClear QuizzesOld SchoolAttendance Strict
  • Many students get A's if they participate, read, and ; others find lectures slow or off-topic.
  • and , so grade visibility can lag.
  • Online pandemic section felt disorganized compared with stronger in-person reports.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple A's and comments that and you know exactly what is tested.

Easy-A tone is mostly in person; online review got a B with weaker experience.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Sociology content is manageable; , and participation rather than advanced theory.

In-person reviews drive easiness; online felt messier, not harder intellectually.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

few absences and skip-class warnings.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

56/100

; fans love care and clarity while critics hate pace, off-topic lectures, or online chaos.

; in-person opinions split more evenly.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Clear policies and do the work.

Format shift

; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Weekly quizzes, reading, notes, and a major essay keep load moderate.

Format shift

Similar moderate load online and in person, plus online group work friction.

Teaching experience

Good

64/100

Caring and insightful for engaged students, but can drift off-topic, go slowly, or mishandle remote class.

Format shift

pivot review.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Blend of , and participation rather than pure exams.

Format shift

In person emphasizes quizzes and exams; online also stressed group assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is often caring with , and solid grades for engaged students.

Main concern

Slow or off-topic lectures and .

What students said

“Easy A you know exactly what and test.”
SOC1
“we didn't know our overall grade until the last day of the semester. This was because he is very old-school and .”
S0C010
“miss more than 3 days every day after is 5 percent off your total grade”
SOC01

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One pandemic online section felt unstable, group-heavy, and poorly prepared for remote delivery.

Main concern

and heavy group-work assumptions during online pivot.

What students said

“professor Riley did not seem ready for the online transition of the class. ”
HMSV42

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes often come from the book with known content; midterm and .

Take-Home QuizzesBook-Based QuizzesKnown Quiz ContentMultiple Choice Midterm FinalClear Grading Criteria

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final with very clear expectations.

Take-Home QuizzesBook-Based QuizzesMultiple Choice Midterm Final
“His class mostly consists of lectures and you go to class.”
SOC01
“Easy A you know exactly what and test.”
SOC1
“There is a and .”
SOC01

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove a specific exam proctoring policy; .

Unclear Exam Policy
“ and changed to better fit the situation, making it feel unstable.”
HMSV42

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A you know exactly what and test. and will talk about her once in a while.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (1 online, 8 in and quiz clarity. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“Truly wants students to do well and learn how to see life/society from a sociological perspective.”

📅

12/100

“miss more than 3 days every day after is 5 percent off your total grade”

📗 Easy Quizzes

78/100

“ required in this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He gives great insight.
  • he lectures slower than a tortoise
  • wasting his lectures on our behavior rather than the course material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A you know exactly what and test.
  • Pretty cool professor! :)
  • we didn't know our overall grade until the last day of the semester

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • he cares a lot about his students
  • Caring
  • he loves Beyonce and will talk about her once in a while.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mostly detailed reviews from 2018-2021 with , and caring tone.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SOC013 reviews
SOC12 reviews
HMSV421 review
S0C0101 review
SOC01A1 review
Show 1 more courses
SOC1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values