AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Marie Bruley

MATH88 · MATH4C · CALC4B · MATH4A · ALGALG · MATH1496 · A4 · MATHC · MATH10 · MATH21 · MATH04B · MATH80 · TRIG0025 · MATHA1463 · MATHA1464 · MATH4B · MATH81 · MATH02 · MATH811601 · MATH04A · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
23.08%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if and tolerate a sometimes harsh teaching style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing teacherTest heavyLecture heavyTough graderCan be condescending
  • many love her clarity and , many call her rude and confusing.
  • and can feel unlike study guides.
  • Recent online and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Some students get easy As with steady work, but .

; older in-person reviews more often report easy As with attendance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Lower courses can feel easy when taught clearly; calc and stats often feel harder than expected.

Online and recent in-person lean harder; older developmental math reviews lean easier.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Many sections mark attendance mandatory or warn that skipping means you will not pass.

Online participation matters; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Would-take-again is only about 23%, with .

; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Extra credit appears for some, but tough grader and overall.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize tough .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of homework, long lectures, and .

Format shift

; online adds paid quiz platforms.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Quality ratings average mid-3s because excellent explainers sit beside reports of rudeness and confusion.

Format shift

Older in-person praise is strong; recent online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

and homework may not match exams.

Format shift

Online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

to rude, confusing, and exam-misaligned; success usually requires attendance and heavy study.

Main concern

Condescending tone and guides.

What students said

“The absolute worse Math professor I had at Merced College.”
MATH04A
“Even if youre not great at math her class is pretty easy.”
MATHC
“If you pay attention and do the work I'm sure you'll get an easy "A."”
MATH80

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students mostly report weak teaching videos, test-heavy grades, paid homework platforms, and .

Main concern

while lectures and .

What students said

“4 tests overall & these tests are basically your entire grade so study up or you will fail the class”
MATH04A
“All she would do was post videos and .”
MATH10
“Answers questions with more questions. Doesnt use the textbook at all so its basically pointless to have.”
MATH88

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and drive most of the course grade.

Test heavyExams unlike homeworkStudy guides providedNo cheat notes reported

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

guides, with no cheat notes in at least one stats section.

Exam heavyExams unlike homeworkNo cheat notes
“Class is an so get ready for sleepless nights and panic cram study sessions.”
MATH04A
“the guides she gives.”
MATH10

Online

; study guides exist but exams still dominate.

Test heavyKnewton homeworkStudy guides
“4 tests overall & these tests are basically your entire grade so study up or you will fail the class”
MATH04A
“the quizzes and homework are super easy - you can easily get 100%. BUT .”
MATH10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Skip this professor!!!!!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews (5 online, 38 in-person), highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She is really good at explaining things and gives great responses to questions!”

👎 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“ unless you absolutely have to.”

📝

35/100

“4 tests overall & these tests are basically your entire grade so study up or you will fail the class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • really good at explaining things
  • lectures are long and gruesome with her monotonal voice
  • makes the material harder than it seemed

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Test heavy
  • you'll get an easy A
  • guides

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Caring
  • Has a tendency to be condescending
  • VERY VERY RUDE

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-three reviews over many years with rich detail and a stable polarized pattern give strong credibility despite mixed opinions.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH807 reviews
MATH04A5 reviews
MATH104 reviews
MATH4A4 reviews
MATHC4 reviews
Show 15 more courses
MATH212 reviews
MATH812 reviews
MATH882 reviews
MATHA14632 reviews
A41 review
ALGALG1 review
CALC4B1 review
MATH021 review
MATH04B1 review
MATH14961 review
MATH4B1 review
MATH4C1 review
MATH8116011 review
MATHA14641 review
TRIG00251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1