AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

George Werness

PHILO1091 · PH110 · PHIL12 · PHILOSOPHY10 · PHIL10 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you have no other option for the course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear TeachingTough GraderHigh DropoutRidicules StudentsAvoid
  • Overwhelming consensus that and unhelpful.
  • and subjective standards lead to many failures and drops.
  • Students feel shut down when asking questions.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students report , and needing to think exactly like him to pass.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

High difficulty ratings and reports that even strong students struggle with .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance is repeatedly marked mandatory with .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Nearly ; take-again rate is effectively zero.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

, and comments that only a few students pass.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Test-heavy structure and constant struggle .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students say he knows content but cannot teach it and often ridicules questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test-heavy tags and comments emphasize midterms, finals, and few graded items.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

as , and demoralizing with high failure and dropout rates.

Main concern

.

What students said

“This professor .”
PHIL10
“It started off as a 40 seat class that was full and we ended the semester with 14 people. And only 3 passed.”
PHIL10
“ ”
PHIL12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and as hard and subjective with no student-friendly format noted.

Tough graderTest heavySubjective grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Test-heavy and tough grading; .

Test heavyTough graderUnclear expectations
“ , and grades super hard.”
PHIL10
“if you dont think like him. He will not pass you”
PHIL10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting unclear teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

15/100

“He clearly knows his stuff but is incapable of teaching it properly.”

⚖️

12/100

“only 3 passed. Luckily I was one of them but I had to work my butt off to think like him.”

👎

8/100

“Absolutely terrible class and professor. Has no idea what he's teaching or talking about.”

📉 Student Retention

10/100

“It started off as a 40 seat class that was full and we ended the semester with 14 people.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor .
  • his handwriting is terrible. the way of .
  • cant understand what hes saying..cant even read his handwriting

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grades super hard
  • Does not like to give you good grades.
  • only 3 passed

Theme 3

💔 About Classroom Climate

  • He also ridiculed the students asking questions
  • shoots you down and makes you feel dumb for your wrong answer
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews across many years with highly consistent negative themes and detailed examples.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 515

Course coverage

PHIL1014 reviews
PH1101 review
PHIL121 review
PHILO10911 review
PHILOSOPHY101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3