AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Pam Gingold

CORE1 · PSYCABAD · PSYC09 · CLDV08 · FCSC8 · HUMANDEVE · CLDV09 · HUMANDEV · CORE1108 · PSYCH1054 · CLDV9 · CLDV53 · HUMANDEVEL · HUMANDEVELOPME · CHILD09 · PSYC6558 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a supportive, reflective class and and writing.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExtremely caringSelf-reflective workGroup-project heavyInspirationalOrganization varies
  • Many students call her transformative, caring, and one of the
  • Classes mix writing, group work, videos, and personal
  • A vocal , so experience can vary

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many say the class is easy if and the big presentation, with .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is approachable and reflective, though some writing and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

, but most focus on engagement and assignments over policing seats.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Would-take-again is 100% among those who answered, and many call her outstanding despite some organization gripes.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Presentation and completed assignments drive success; appears and hard high-stakes testing is rare.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Lots of writing and ; workload is consistent but not light for everyone.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most praise care, inspiration, and learning about self; a minority calls her boring or unorganized.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Many papers, group exercises, videos, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person psych and child , and growth-focused with lots of support.

Main concern

Organization and .

What students said

“This was the best class I ever had at Merced College.”
PSYCABAD
“Pam is an .”
CLDV09
“ . ”
CLDV09

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is assignment- and presentation-heavy with .

Few testsBig presentationGroup workReflective papers

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a large presentation rather than exams.

Hardly any tests400-point presentationGroup work
“ and everything is mostly group work.”
CLDV9
“There's a big presentation at the end worth 400 points.”
CLDV9

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was the best class I ever had at Merced College. Bright and friendly, Pam knows her stuff.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 in-person reviews, highlighting care, reflective workload, and organization split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Professor Gingold is one of the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ .”

❤️ Student Care

85/100

“She is always there for you & wants you to succeed.”

📝 Assignment Focus

78/100

“ and everything is mostly group work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are fun, including many videos and group exercises
  • She trusts that you'll get all the assignments done.
  • kept things 'changed up' with

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her class is easy.
  • Hard class but .
  • As long as you do the presentation, you're guarantee to pass.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • .
  • middle of the course
  • ...n shes really boring!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

22 reviews are mostly older with strong praise and a ; grade data is thin.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CLDV093 reviews
CHILD092 reviews
CLDV92 reviews
HUMANDEV2 reviews
PSYCH10542 reviews
Show 11 more courses
CLDV081 review
CLDV531 review
CORE11 review
CORE11081 review
FCSC81 review
HUMANDEVE1 review
HUMANDEVEL1 review
HUMANDEVELOPME1 review
PSYC091 review
PSYC65581 review
PSYCABAD1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values