AI Rate Professor

Communication

William Walls

ELCT40B · ELECT30 · ELECTIND · ELCT40C · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Only consider him if and stay for ; sparse data makes him a risk.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlideshow LecturesAttendance-Heavy GradesEasygoing GraderSparse ReviewsSelf-Study Friendly
  • Very few reviews exist, so confidence is limited and mixed.
  • One detailed recent review says he mostly reads , and tests are hard but answers are online.
  • Older comments call him nice and easygoing, even suggesting he rarely fails students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Older , but the only reported grade is a C after leaving early, so .

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Material seems passable with self-study, though one student found tests hard and lectures unengaging.

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

The and is most of the grade.

; no online reviews available.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

One student would not take him , and sample size is tiny.

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Comments say he is too nice and probably never flunks students, though leaving early can still sink your grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

68/100

Little ; the main burden is sitting through slideshows and attendance.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

One review criticizes pure slideshow teaching, while older reviews call him well-meaning and subject-knowledgeable.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Tests and attendance appear to drive .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Limited in-person feedback paints a slideshow-heavy, attendance-weighted class with mixed teaching praise and .

Main concern

while live teaching feels thin.

What students said

“He does not really teach, he just goes through slideshows the whole time”
ELCT40B
“most of ”
ELCT40B
“Probably never flunked anyone ever.”
ELECTIND

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One student says tests are hard but answers can be found online, with .

Hard testsAnswers onlineAttendance-weighted grade

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard with answers available online, while .

Hard testsAnswers onlineAttendance-heavy grading
“ but answers are online.”
ELCT40B
“most of ”
ELCT40B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He does not really teach, he just goes through slideshows the whole time which can get boring and make you not want to stay for the entire class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 sparse in-person , and low evidence confidence. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“He does not really teach, he just goes through slideshows the whole time”

📅

15/100

“most of ”

⚖️

72/100

“Probably never flunked anyone ever.”

⚠️ Limited Sample

28/100

“You can learn alot more studying on your own.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he just goes through slideshows the whole time
  • Mostly knows subject well, but might bluff on rare occasions
  • Bill means well

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Attendance

  • most of
  • I ended up with a C for leaving early all the time
  • Probably never flunked anyone ever.

Theme 3

🧩

  • You can learn alot more studying on your own
  • but answers are online

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews, many years old and mostly thin on detail, so conclusions rest on sparse mixed evidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ELCT40B1 review
ELCT40C1 review
ELECT301 review
ELECTIND1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values