AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Christopher Pedretti

KINE35 · KINE01 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can work fully independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to reachUnresponsiveNo syllabusUnfriendlyAvoid
  • Most students call him unresponsive and hard to contact, sometimes needing the dean.
  • Two of three reviews rate quality 1; one older review calls him the .
  • and a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned a B; reviews stress access and teaching, not free As.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-range with no comments calling content easy or brain-melting.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

75/100

; others do not stress strict attendance.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Only one of ; majority warn about poor communication and support.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Little grade detail beyond one B and complaints about a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reviews focus on access and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Two low ratings cite unfriendly, unhelpful teaching and no syllabus against one high praise.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

: one rave, two strong complaints about access and friendliness.

Main concern

Extremely hard to contact and unhelpful when students need support.

What students said

“Unfriendly, unhelpful and extremely hard to get a hold of.”
KINE35
“Not a good instructor. Very hard to get a hold of.”
KINE01
“ !”
KINE01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

usable detail.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unfriendly, unhelpful and extremely hard to get a hold of. because he wasn't responding.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning 2017-2018. Credibility rating: Low.

📵 Hard to Reach

25/100

“Very hard to get a hold of.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“Not a good instructor.”

📋 Missing Structure

20/100

“No syllabus, just a confusing and .”

Theme 1

📞 About Communication

  • Very hard to get a hold of.
  • I had to e-mail the dean because he wasn't responding.
  • Unfriendly, unhelpful and extremely hard to get a hold of.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • !
  • Not a good instructor.
  • Merced College is usually learning disability friendly, but this professor is not.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews (2017-2018) with mixed extremes and limited grade detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

KINE012 reviews
KINE351 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values