AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Charlie Hoag

MATH10 · MATHMATH · MATH2 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

; most students report confusing teaching and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerWorst teacherHard to understandMakes math mistakesHarsh graderStay away
  • Five of six reviews rate quality 1 and urge students to stay away.
  • Students say , and gets angry when they do not understand.
  • One outlier 2018 review calls him the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Students report and high difficulty overall.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High difficulty ratings and comments about hard-to-follow math make the content feel heavy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Almost all detailed reviews say stay away despite a .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students claim right answers still scored low and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

High difficulty and struggle to learn from lectures imply heavy study burden.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Repeated , and should retire.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math classes draw overwhelmingly negative reviews about clarity, errors, and grading.

Main concern

, math mistakes, and grades that feel disconnected from correct answers.

What students said

“he is the . stay away from him.”
MATHMATH
“horrible teacher. i would answer all the but still only get a C on it.”
MATH10
“ !!!!”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests exist and feel strict or unfair, but .

In-person testsHarsh test grading

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mention .

In-person testsHarsh test grading
“i would answer all the but still only get a C on it.”
MATH10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he is the . stay away from him. he doesn't have time for student. hard to understand. he always makes math mistakes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, mostly 2006-2008 plus one 2018 outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

18/100

“Does not know how to teach and needs to retire”

📉 Unfair Tests

20/100

“i would answer all the but still only get a C on it.”

⚠️

15/100

“ !!!!”

Theme 1

🧮 About Math Clarity

  • hard to understand. he always makes math mistakes.
  • he doesn't seem to understand the material very well.
  • and he gets mad if you don't understand something.

Theme 2

📉 About Grades & Difficulty

  • i would answer all the but still only get a C on it.
  • The career.
  • Awful

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews are consistent on poor teaching, but most are from 2006-2008 with one 2018 outlier.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH103 reviews
MATH22 reviews
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values