AI Rate Professor

Engineering

James Thornburgh

DRAFTING · DRFT4B · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you like learning software by experimenting with a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLearn by doingGives good feedbackHands-on draftingTrial and error labSupportive presence
  • Students rate him highly for drafting courses and report A grades.
  • He helps when needed but expects independent software experimentation.
  • and textbooks may be used, yet difficulty stays moderate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Reported grades are A with moderate difficulty and strong quality ratings.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty ratings are low-to-moderate and students describe the setup as manageable personal preference.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Two credit reviews state attendance was mandatory for the drafting classes.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

All quality scores are 4-5 with and short praise like great teacher.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students report A grades and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

; learning is hands-on practice rather than piles of assignments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Consistently high ratings for helpful presence and a teaching style students call great.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Drafting learning centers on software practice and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person drafting is project-style learning with instructor help on demand and strong overall satisfaction.

Main concern

Students who want step-by-step software lectures may find the method too independent.

What students said

“While he how to use the software he is there to help you learn if you need help.”
DRFT4B
“His teaching method is for students to learn by experimenting with different techniques on your own with trial and error.”
DRFT4B
“Great Teacher”
DRAFTING

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize trial-and-error software work and do not describe strict proctored exams.

Project-based practiceLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person drafting appears project and practice oriented; reviews do .

Project-based practiceLimited exam detail
“His teaching method is for students to learn by experimenting with different techniques on your own with trial and error.”
DRFT4B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“While he how to use the software he is there to help you learn if you need help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting hands-on drafting support and high praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

🛠️ Teaching Method

90/100

“His teaching method is for students to learn by experimenting with different techniques on your own with trial and error.”

👍 Recommendation

92/100

“Great Teacher”

📝 Feedback

85/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • how to use the software he is there to help you learn
  • learn by experimenting
  • trial and error

Theme 2

❤️ About Overall Vibe

  • Great Teacher
  • He's great

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews, all positive, with limited assessment detail and dates spanning 2013-2018.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

DRAFTING2 reviews
DRFT4B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values