AI Rate Professor

Music

Lorraine Walsh

MUSA21A · MUSG11 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Proceed with caution and confirm current syllabus and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizingLecture heavyTough graderCaring for someUnclear assignments
  • Only two reviews exist and they sharply disagree on teaching quality.
  • One student praises calm, patient care; the and no syllabus follow-through.
  • Credibility is low, so outcomes may depend heavily on the specific music course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

One student earned an A , so an A is possible but not effortless.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-range with lecture-heavy music coursework and reading.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

while the other does not clearly state a policy.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

harsh unclear grading.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

and harsh assignment scoring dominate the negative review.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Lecture-heavy classes and unexplained assignments suggest steady work without full workload detail.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

One review says calm and caring; the other says she is always right and unhelpful.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Negative review centers on unexplained assignments and harsh scoring more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Two in-person music reviews split between caring/patient and .

Main concern

Conflicting reports make it hard to predict whether you get support or .

What students said

“She does a great job. , and seems to care about students”
MUSG11
“ and then grades you harshly for your lack of understanding.”
MUSA21A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

a clear exam policy.

Assignment-focused grading
“ and then grades you harshly for your lack of understanding.”
MUSA21A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does a great job. , and seems to care about students”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with opposite tones. Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Supportive Side

80/100

“ , and seems to care about students”

⚖️

25/100

“ and then grades you harshly for your lack of understanding.”

🤷 Split Verdict

50/100

“In her classes she is always right and the students are wrong.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • calm, patient, and seems to care
  • Caring

Theme 2

📝

  • grades you harshly

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two 2017 in-person reviews with opposite scores sharply limit reliability.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MUSA21A1 review
MUSG111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values