AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mai Meidinger

MATHC169 · PRECA1234 · MATHA · PRECA02 · MATH25 · MATH005 · MATH80 · MATH4B · PRECAL · MATH02 · MATHCHYBRID · MATHALGE · MATH409 · MATHC2308 · MATHC · MATH80A · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Strong pick for in-person math if you show up and do the homework; think twice about her online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing LecturesCaring MentorPop QuizzesClear ExplanationsOnline Hit or Miss
  • and strong support.
  • Online sections are mixed, with several students citing slow or .
  • Pop quizzes and and practice.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

, and , but many say you can earn a solid grade by showing up and practicing.

In-person reviews stress effort-for-reward; online grades vary more with support quality.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Most students call concepts clear and , though a few higher sections feel rushed.

follow than online.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Pop quizzes and tags warning that skipped .

; online attendance rules vary.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, while online feedback is mixed enough to keep the overall score below MustTake.

; online reviews pull the recommendation down.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students often call homework lenient and note multiple quiz attempts online, though .

Format shift

Leniency is clearer in in-person comments than in frustrated online reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

and occasional pop quizzes are steady but rarely described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Both formats mention MathXL-style homework; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Clear lectures, passion for math, and .

Format shift

some call her unresponsive.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and a .

Format shift

Both formats use quizzes and exams; online also stresses multiple-attempt quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe , and strong encouragement to ask questions.

Main concern

Pop quizzes and no late .

What students said

“Her lectures are easy to follow and does a great job of explaining math problems.”
MATHC169
“She is the so far for my freshman year.”
MATH25
“If you just go to class and even trying!”
MATH80

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online and unresponsive instruction that led some students to drop.

Main concern

Some online students report ignored emails and little outside help.

What students said

“Lousy online instructor. Very inconsistent and never returns your emails for help.”
MATHC169
“This is the .”
PRECAL
“get a tutor, I if you don't understand”
MATHC2308

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard math testing with frequent quizzes and attempts online.

Pop QuizzesMathXL HomeworkCumulative FinalStudy Guides or Note Cards

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and timed quizzes reward class attendance; .

Pop QuizzesTimed QuizzesCumulative FinalStudy Guides
“Try not to miss class or you might miss a .”
MATHC169
“There are 4 exams and a .”
MATHC

Online

and scheduled midterms; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Multiple Quiz AttemptsEmail-Based SupportScheduled Midterms
“The tests and quizes are pretty easy because you get several attempts to do them so you can keep trying for a 100%.”
MATHC
“you know exactly what is coming on the tests”
PRECAL

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Never had a math professor that was more passionate about math than her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews (7 online, 25 in person), highlighting format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“She is the so far for my freshman year.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“Great professor if you have an .”

💻 Online Caution

40/100

“She might be okay in person but stay away from her online class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are easy to follow
  • very caring and she knows her stuff
  • makes it fun and easy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • pull off a B without even trying
  • no sympathy and

Theme 3

💻 About Online vs In Person

  • never returns your emails for help
  • stay away from her online class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two reviews spanning many years show strong consistency for .

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATHC8 reviews
MATHC1695 reviews
MATH4B3 reviews
MATH802 reviews
MATHC23082 reviews
Show 11 more courses
PRECA022 reviews
MATH0051 review
MATH021 review
MATH251 review
MATH4091 review
MATH80A1 review
MATHA1 review
MATHALGE1 review
MATHCHYBRID1 review
PRECA12341 review
PRECAL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1