AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gurmukh Singh

MATHAA · MATHC · MATH81 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already strong in math and can handle strict rules plus self-teaching.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard to understand accentStrict attendanceDisrespectful toneInflexible methodsNeeds outside tutors
  • Thick accent and closed question policy make lectures .
  • Strict lateness and misses.
  • Several students report disrespect and forced long solution methods.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students needed tutors and faced high difficulty; an A still came with painful methods.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Difficulty often rated 4-5 and accent plus rigid methods make content harder.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Late arrivals write names; miss four days and ; .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

and comments urge struggle and outside tutors.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

High difficulty and forced longest methods make grades feel costly even when passable.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, but students needed multiple tutors to keep up.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Accent barriers, blocked questions, and disrespect overshadow any content teaching.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments focus on in-class methods and .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Most students struggle with accent, limited questions, harsh classroom tone, and rigid problem methods; one old empty review is milder.

Main concern

, and disrespect when challenged.

What students said

“Hard to understand with his thick accent. Not open to other methods of completing equations.”
MATH81
“Miss 4 days he will drop u”
MATHC
“Is very disrespectful in class if you prove him wrong.”
MATH81

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; difficulty comes from teaching style.

In-class problem methods enforced

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; class work must follow his longest methods.

In-class problem methods enforced
“Makes you do problems the longest and hardest way even if you can do it an easier and faster way.”
MATH81

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hard to understand with his thick accent. Not open to other methods of completing equations. Does not allow questions during class time. . Disrespects people in class for the slightest offense.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting accent barriers and strict rules. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Hard to understand with his thick accent.”

🚫 Recommendation

15/100

“I needed TWO tutors in order to pass his class”

⏰

12/100

“Miss 4 days he will drop u”

😠 Classroom Tone

20/100

“Is very disrespectful in class if you prove him wrong.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hard to understand with his thick accent
  • Does not allow questions during class time
  • Makes you do problems the longest and hardest way

Theme 2

⏰

  • if your 5 min late he will make you write your name down
  • Miss 4 days he will drop u

Theme 3

😠 About Character

  • Disrespects people in class for the slightest offense
  • very disrespectful in class if you prove him wrong

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews spanning 2011-2016 with strong negative consistency; one empty positive-ish score adds limited noise.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH812 reviews
MATHAA1 review
MATHC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values