AI Rate Professor

Communication

Nancy Fraleigh

COMM01 · COMMENTSI · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Only take her if you already speak well and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInconsistent GradingTough On BeginnersEnthusiastic But DemandingAttendance HeavyUnclear Criteria
  • Mixed reviews with one strong positive and two critical takes on intro public speaking
  • and tough for beginners seeking an A
  • as essential to protect the grade

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Students report and warn that chasing an A in this intro class is a bad bet.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Intro public speaking is treated like advanced work, with high performance expectations for beginners.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory and needed to protect your grade.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

One student loved her, but and unclear beginner support.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Called a and little path to an easy A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Work centers on speeches and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Some praise her as kind and and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades hinge on in-class speeches, attendance, and speech preparation rather than classic exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and funny but often expects expert-level speaking too early, with unclear criteria and .

Main concern

and beginner-unfriendly expectations for an intro course.

What students said

“She had no consistency in .”
COMM01
“ , so if you're looking for an A, this is not your class!!”
COMMENTSI
“Overall the and important to attend class regularly to maintain your grade.”
COMM01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is speech-centered with regular attendance pressure; .

In-class speechesAttendance-linked grading

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews focus on in-class speeches and attendance-linked grading rather than traditional proctored exams.

In-class speechesAttendance-linked grading
“important to attend class regularly to maintain your grade”
COMM01
“provide us the guidance to be prepared for in-class speeches”
COMM01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , so if you're looking for an A, this is not your class!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting grading inconsistency and beginner fit. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ and funny during our lectures and provide us the guidance to be prepared for in-class speeches.”

⚖️

28/100

“She had no consistency in .”

📉 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and funny during our lectures
  • Sometimes very
  • she is a nice lady and very enthusiastic

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was difficult
  • no consistency in

Theme 3

🚪 About Fit For Beginners

  • expects her students to be expert public speakers
  • Tough class, unless you're majoring in Communications

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old 2015 in-person reviews with mixed detail and , so confidence is limited.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMM012 reviews
COMMENTSI1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values