AI Rate Professor

Science

Natalie German

BEGAL6538 · MATH · MATHA6150 · MATH25 · MATH80 · MATHA415 · MATHTRIG · MATH26 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if she is still teaching math; prepare for tests and you will learn a lot.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear ExplanationsBest Math TeacherPatient MentorTest-FocusedSupportive Returning Student
  • Students repeatedly call her the best math teacher they ever had
  • Clear expectations and
  • Course is not easy but she supports struggling and returning students well

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Homework and , but and the class is not free.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Math content is solidly challenging; many say it is not easy but learnable with her help.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several reviews state attendance was mandatory with little flexibility noted.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Nearly all students rave and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grading is mostly test-based; and paths to A or B exist.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Little or ; main load is preparing for tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students praise clear explanations, patience, and confidence-building, especially for returning learners.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

; homework is light and sometimes .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Highly praised in-person math instructor who explains clearly, helps returning students, and .

Main concern

A and not always aligned with homework; .

What students said

“You were my best math instructor ever!”
MATH25
“if you do the ”
MATH25
“She was good at explaining material and . All she asks is to be ready for her tests.”
MATH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; one review says tests were hard and .

Test-Based GradingIn-Person TestsHomework May Not Match Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students must be ready for tests and some found them hard.

Test-Based GradingIn-Person Tests
“ .”
MATH
“ and not related to the .”
MATH26

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“What? She isn't at MCC? Hope you are still teaching, Ms. German! You were my best math instructor ever!”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews spanning 2007-2015, highlighting teaching praise and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“She is really an excellent teacher. She explains things well and clearly, and time.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“She's fantastic and I highly reccomend her.”

📚 Effort for Grades

62/100

“if you do the . The only people who say the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was one of the best math teachers I have ever had.
  • and clearly, and
  • Good teacher. .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class sint easy, but I learned a lot in it.
  • if you do the
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Even with an accent i understood her very well.
  • now I feel confident about math.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews show strong positive consensus but span 2007-2015 with limited grade data and older dates.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH254 reviews
MATH263 reviews
MATH803 reviews
MATH2 reviews
BEGAL65381 review
Show 3 more courses
MATHA4151 review
MATHA61501 review
MATHTRIG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values