AI Rate Professor

English

Tony White

ENG1A · ENG1242 · ENG85 · ENGLISH1A · ENGL12 · ENGLISH · COLLEAGUE · ENGLA · ENG01A · ENGL01A · ENG01A01B · ENG41 · HUM15 · ENGLA1242 · ENGLISH1A41 · ENGL83 · ENGLISH1B · ENGLISH85 · ENGL1A · ENGL85 · READ801848 · CREATIVEWRITIN · ENGLISH41 · ENG1B · REASONING · ENGLISHA · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a challenge and ; otherwise pick another English instructor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerNitpicky GraderLong LecturesHard of HearingMind-Reading RubricPolarizing Style
  • and nitpicky, especially on titles and format details.
  • to hear due to his hearing issues.
  • A and mind-opening when students match his open-minded style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Even strong students report Bs or drops because and viewpoint.

Nearly all grade-difficulty evidence is in person; the one online review did not discuss grade struggle.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Content and pacing often feel hard, with , and high intellectual demands for English work.

In-person comments dominate; online student found the course manageable with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and stress that showing up and paying attention is required to pass.

; online attendance was not described.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendations split hard between students who love his open-minded style and those who call him a waste of time.

; the single online review was strongly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly describe nitpicking titles, Works Cited wording, and .

Format shift

Harsh grading complaints are almost all from in-person English courses.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload centers on readings, papers, and long lectures rather than a , but expectations stay high.

Format shift

Workload comments are nearly all in person; .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some call him excellent and mind-opening while many find lectures long, off-topic, quiet, or hard to hear.

Format shift

In-person quality is mixed; the lone online review rated teaching very highly.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment is driven by papers and format details more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Paper-focused grading appears across in-person English courses; exams are rarely mentioned.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and lectures long or , while others say he pushes deep thinking and is helpful if you keep up.

Main concern

Nitpicky grading and even for strong students.

What students said

“He is a terrible and . You will not pass if you can't read his mind.”
ENGLISH85
“ though i am a 4.00 student, because he does not grade fairly.”
ENG01A
“in order to get an A in his class you have to work really hard.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review praises him as , and .

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so the glowing online experience may not generalize.

What students said

“Honestly he's been the and forgiving instructor I've ever had at this school.”
ENGL01A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely describe formal exams and .

Paper-Based AssessmentFormat NitpickingLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and titles rather than proctored exams.

Essay HeavyStrict Paper Format
“You will fail an assignment if you do not put the correct title.”
ENGLISH85
“He marked me down for writing "Bibliography" instead of "Works Cited".”
ENG01A

Online

review.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a terrible and . You will not pass if you can't read his mind.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting grading fairness, lecture style, and recommendation split. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

28/100

“He is a terrible and . You will not pass if you can't read his mind.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Mr. White is an amazing teacher. He definatley encourages his students to think deep and read in between the lines.”

📈 Effort for an A

35/100

“in order to get an A in his class you have to work really hard.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ . If you do not think exactly like him you will fail.”

Theme 1

📝

  • You will not pass if you can't read his mind.
  • If you don't write your papers exactly how he expects get ready to fail.
  • He does not grade fairly.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are way to long and most of the time he ends up rambling.
  • He encourages students to think deep and .
  • He's hard of hearing and very spacey.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Tony tries to be a nice guy but he usually just comes off as being condescending.
  • He's a but as a teacher I wouldn't recommed him.
  • Tony White is awesome.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews spanning many years with detailed comments and and lecture style support a .

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 56
3 out of 510
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1A6 reviews
ENGLISH854 reviews
ENG01A3 reviews
ENG852 reviews
ENGLA2 reviews
Show 21 more courses
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENGLISHA2 reviews
COLLEAGUE1 review
CREATIVEWRITIN1 review
ENG01A01B1 review
ENG12421 review
ENG1B1 review
ENG411 review
ENGL01A1 review
ENGL121 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGL831 review
ENGL851 review
ENGLA12421 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1A411 review
ENGLISH1B1 review
ENGLISH411 review
HUM151 review
READ8018481 review
REASONING1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values