AI Rate Professor

Business

Toni Reintke

COMP30 · CPSC20 · OFCT57 · CPSCCPSC · CPSC2316 · CS1111 · BUSINESS43 · VIRT1942 · CPSC30 · AOM53 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you already have basic computer skills and will chase help in person; avoid if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing HelpfulnessDisorganized OnlineFair AssignmentsComputer Novice StruggleInconsistent Clarity
  • Students split and saying she withholds help especially online.
  • Assignments and and spaced, so coasting to an A is possible when the course is organized.
  • Online and intro computer sections draw the harshest complaints about Blackboard chaos and vague instructions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students report fair quizzes, spaced due dates, and even getting answers on assessments, so an A is reachable with steady work.

Online evidence includes a and a ; most easy-A signals come from older in-person and hybrid-linked reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is mostly intro computer skills, but Blackboard quirks and material for some students.

Online reviews show wider difficulty swings; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, and online students are often told to come to office hours instead of getting remote help.

; online students especially resent office-hours-only help.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendations hinge on whether students already know computers and can push for help; otherwise many warn others away.

; online reviews are polarized between glowing and strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Assignments are often described as fair, and completing the work is usually enough to pass or earn a high grade.

Format shift

Both formats mention fair work; online organization issues hurt .

Workload

Light

68/100

Workload is light to moderate with few spaced assignments, though missing any of them can tank the grade.

Format shift

Online COMP30 reported fair spaced work; .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Helpful and personable for and impatient for others, especially with computer beginners.

Format shift

In-person students more often praise help; online students more often report poor support.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of , and occasional projects rather than pure finals.

Format shift

Evidence is mostly from in-person CPSC30 comments about quizzes and multiple-choice tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Many praise her willingness to help and , while others cite vague instructions, limited patience, and poor online-style organization even for campus-linked courses.

Main concern

You must complete every assignment and seek help .

What students said

“Awesome teacher! Has a great philosophy about you can't learn computers just through a book.”
CPSCCPSC
“Instructions were vague. Things had to be her way or the highway.”
VIRT1942
“As an online instructor, she is the .”
CPSC30

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One student coasted to a solid A with fair work; another found the , and unhelpful for non-computer students.

Main concern

Organization and support quality are inconsistent across online sections.

What students said

“Toni was very, very helpful & allowed me to coast to a solid A in the class.”
COMP30
“ . Instructor did not seem to help with understanding material.”
AOM53

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments lean on quizzes and concept tests rather than clearly described high-stakes proctored finals.

QuizzesMultiple Choice Concept TestsAssignments Weighted

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mention assessments and multiple-choice Access tests more than closed-book proctored finals.

Multiple Choice Access TestAssessmentsHomework Files
“the if it were a hands-on creation of a database rather than a and definitions.”
CPSC30

Online

Online comments focus on quizzes and .

QuizzesFair Assignments
“ , and due dates were well spaced.”
COMP30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Toni was very, very helpful & allowed me to coast to a solid A in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews (2 online, 14 in person), highlighting mixed help quality, fair workload, and online organization risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She is an excellent instructor. Very knowledgeable and personable.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“Would not reccommend this teacher due to her lack of patience and help with those less aware of computers.”

📈 Easy Grade Potential

78/100

“If you're lucky enough to sift through the garbage you will realize that all and she gives u the answers”

🧭 Online Organization Risk

40/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • couldn't understand something.
  • Sometimes she was a but shes human.
  • Awesome teacher! Has a great philosophy about you can't learn computers just through a book.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • allowed me to coast to a solid A in the class
  • the and far in between so you better do them all or you will fail
  • Do not reccomend for U, if ur not familiar with computers.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Support

  • Her only response to questions was, come see me during my office hours
  • There was little difference in her lack of helping.
  • any questions I ever had, she got back to me via e-mail within a day.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews give decent volume, but they span 2005-2015 with split opinions and little grade data, so confidence is only medium.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CPSC307 reviews
AOM531 review
BUSINESS431 review
COMP301 review
CPSC201 review
Show 5 more courses
CPSC23161 review
CPSCCPSC1 review
CS11111 review
OFCT571 review
VIRT19421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values