AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Andrew Calzadillas

NUTRITION1 · NUTR6064 · NUTR20 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you like hands-on work, but personality fit may vary a lot.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHands-On LabsNo HomeworkPowerPoint TestsPolarizingRespectful Or Rude
  • Two students and light workload
  • One strongly negative review calls him rude and reports an F

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Two reviews paint an easy light class, but one student failed and found it very hard.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Positive reviews rate difficulty at 1 with , while one review rates difficulty at 5.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

while one found him rude and disrespectful.

Split recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but one student reported an F and high difficulty.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

82/100

Multiple comments emphasize no homework and easy lab-focused work.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

Hands-on joyful teaching for some, rude and demeaning for others.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Lectures are PowerPoint-based and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Mostly praised for , and , but one student found him rude and disrespectful.

Main concern

Strong personality clash risk; experience may swing from wonderful to hostile.

What students said

“Awesome teacher. .”
NUTR20
“very respectful and .”
NUTR6064
“Rude, disrespectful and always making me feel unintelligent.”
NUTRITION1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and lab work is a major course piece.

PowerPoint-Based TestsLabs

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students say whatever is on the PowerPoint is on the test; labs are hands-on.

PowerPoint-Based TestsHands-On Labs
“His lectures consist of a powerpoint which can get boring but w/e is on that powerpoint is on the test.”
NUTR20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awesome teacher. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🧪 Lab Experience

85/100

“ .”

📚 Workload

82/100

“very respectful and .”

⚠️ Personality Risk

20/100

“Rude, disrespectful and always making me feel unintelligent.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he is the best
  • Rude, disrespectful and always making me feel unintelligent

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • w/e is on that powerpoint is on the test

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only three older reviews with mixed tones and sparse grade or policy detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

NUTR201 review
NUTR60641 review
NUTRITION11 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values