AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shelia Taddeo

MATH80 · MATHA · MATHA6276 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

strong for some who need basics rebuilt, weaker if .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyMixed ReviewsBasics BuilderScatter BrainedPatient for SomeReturning Student Challenge
  • One student credits her with building strong math foundations and calls her the .
  • A returning student warmed up to her after finding expectations high at first.
  • and scatter-brained for brand-new learners.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

; success seems to track how well you already know basics and keep up with her pace.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Difficulty ratings range from very easy to hard depending on prior math background and time away from school.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

One , and one warns she is not great for students just learning this level.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

; outcomes seem to depend more on readiness than harsh curves.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload details are sparse; the main friction is organization and expected .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Praised as life-changing by one student but and frustrated by another.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews , so assessment style remains mixed or unclear.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

foundational teaching and frustration with disorganization and uneven pacing.

Main concern

Organization and frustration with student confusion can hurt newer or returning learners.

What students said

“Seriously the ... She really helped me understand math and I owe it to her for me getting as far in mathematics as I have”
MATH80
“i didnt like her at first but after a while i felt she was a good teacher... if i could.”
MATHA
“ , and "scatter brained" easily looses track of what she is doing”
MATHA6276

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Seriously the can not give her the . She really helped me understand math”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 mixed in-person Math reviews, highlighting both foundation-building and organization concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Thank you Mrs. T for taking the time to actually teach... We appreciate you from Math C.”

⚠️ Organization Concerns

35/100

“ , and "scatter brained" easily looses track of what she is doing”

👍 Conditional Recommendation

58/100

“i didnt like her at first but after a while i felt she was a good teacher... if i could.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She really helped me understand math and I owe it to her for me getting as far in mathematics as I have
  • sometimes shows her frustration towards students lack of

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Fit

  • she did expect you to know things and for someone returning to school after 15 years i didnt remember some of those things
  • Not that great of a teacher for students just learning this level of math, for those right out of high school she will be easier.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only three in-person reviews from 2011-2012 with conflicting tone and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH801 review
MATHA1 review
MATHA62761 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values