AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Roy Adamson

MATHA1474 · A1 · MATHC1481 · MATHC · MATHC1635 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid if in the math lab.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring lecturesTest-heavy gradingNot clearFunny but unhelpfulDo not recommend
  • Students say he is a but does not teach clearly.
  • Grades .
  • Multiple reviews explicitly advise against taking him.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Tests dominate the grade and students report failing or .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings cluster mid-range; but .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students and point others to different instructors.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Tests are described as easy by some and , but grades .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

as manageable, but students need many hours in the .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Common themes are few examples, mistakes on the , and boring delivery.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Multiple students state that roughly 90 percent of the .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Five in-person reviews consistently describe weak teaching, test-heavy grades, and a need for .

Main concern

and near-total grade weight on tests.

What students said

“Does not teach well, shows very few examples and tends to make many mistakes (can mess up your notes).”
MATHC1635
“I do NOT advise taking this teacher, even though I got an B in his class.”
A1
“boring class.. ! he =)”
MATHC1481

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Grades come almost entirely from frequent chapter tests that are not multiple choice, with one dropped score.

Test-heavy gradeDrops lowest testNot multiple choice

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; tests cover two chapters at a time, are not multiple choice, and the lowest score is dropped.

Test-heavy gradeDrops lowest testNot multiple choiceEvery other chapter
“90 percent of , and his test are EVERY other chapter, covering 2 chapters.”
A1
“ .”
MATHC
“ ! he =)”
MATHC1481

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Does not teach well, shows very few examples and tends to make many mistakes (can mess up your notes). Be prepared to spend many hours in the math lab.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting weak teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

👎 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Does not teach well, shows very few examples and tends to make many mistakes (can mess up your notes).”

📝

88/100

“90 percent of , and his test are EVERY other chapter, covering 2 chapters.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“I do NOT advise taking this teacher, even though I got an B in his class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does not teach well, shows very few examples
  • boring class.. !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 90 percent of
  • Fairly easy if you do the homework and are prepared to spend a few hours a week in the lab

Theme 3

😄 About Personality

  • Partially humorous old man
  • has a dry sence of humor but i found him funny
  • , but failed course because he was boring

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistent in-person reviews from 2010-2011 with matching complaints about teaching and test weight, but all are older and lack grade letters.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

A11 review
MATHA14741 review
MATHC1 review
MATHC14811 review
MATHC16351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values