AI Rate Professor

English

William Vaughn

ENG101 · ENG102 · ENGL101 · EGL101 · 224 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
68.25%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take him if you want an engaging English teacher and will follow prompts closely, but if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderFunny lecturesClear grading when focusedParticipation mattersReading and essays
  • Students often like his energy and teaching style.
  • because .
  • Online reviews are more polarized and include harsher complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Many students earn A or B grades, but getting an A , and exact prompt compliance.

Online evidence is polarized, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

English content is usually manageable, but , and .

Online sections can feel either easy or punishing, while and participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Many reviews say attendance or in-class participation matters, even when some sections are less strict.

, while online reviews often mark attendance mandatory without proving live meeting rules.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most students recommend him for engaging teaching, but .

In-person reviews are more positive overall, while online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly , and low chances of full credit.

Format shift

more often calling it frustrating or unclear.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload ranges from light weekly assignments to essay-heavy sections with readings, quizzes, and papers.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly essays or assignments, while .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Many students call him funny, energetic, clear, and and organization.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is stronger and more frequent, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades mostly come , and participation rather than major exams.

Format shift

Both formats center on writing assignments, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students often praise his humor and energy, but , and .

Main concern

You need to attend, participate, read, and .

What students said

“His teaching style is very interesting and innovative.”
ENG101
“ .”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews and frustration with and unclear prompts.

Main concern

.

What students said

“He is a .”
ENG102
“Professor Vaughn's class is an easy A.”
EGL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment evidence varies across essays, quizzes, weekly exams, and assignments, while reviews do .

Weekly QuizzesPop QuizzesWriting AssignmentsEssaysNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and tests, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Pop QuizzesWeekly QuizzesEssaysIn-Class Assignments
“You'll have a quiz each class but he wont warn you.”
ENG101
“there are .”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews mention exams, weekly exams, essays, and Canvas work, but do not clearly .

Weekly ExamsEssaysCanvas WorkNo Zoom Meetings
“A lot of work, reading and due every week”
EGL101
“There was not zoom meeting .”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you . If you just need credit you won't pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“His teaching style is very interesting and innovative.”

⚖️

28/100

“He will not give a full score no matter what you do.”

👍 Recommendation Level

68/100

“ . I usually hate English classes, but he made it enjoyable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His teaching style is very interesting and innovative.
  • He's funny, enthusiastic, and overall brings a great deal of energy to the classroom.
  • He made learning fun while also making you think outside the box.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • He is a .
  • Every assignment was worth 3 points except for papers, they were worth 6 points.
  • You can't miss a .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload And Difficulty

  • and thought I did well on, but I was graded 2/3.
  • and it's at least 800 words in MLA format.
  • The class was overall pretty easy; he does make you think.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

224

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 authoritative reviews across many years and formats, with consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5102
4 out of 547
3 out of 530
2 out of 518
1 out of 528

Course coverage

ENG10130 reviews
EGL10110 reviews
ENG1026 reviews
ENGL1013 reviews
1021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 2 · A 11 · A- 3

B range

19

B+ 7 · B 9 · B- 3

C range

4

C+ 3 · C 1

D range

4

D+ 2 · D 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3