AI Rate Professor

English

Kristine Oliveira

ENGL101 · ENGL235 · ANTH210 · ENG103 · EGL101 · ENGLI097 · ENG235 · ENG097 · ENGLC1000 · ENG101 · ENG099 · 103 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
61.7%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can keep up with writing work and tolerate late grades, but be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSupportive FeedbackLate GradingWeak Email ResponseManageable Writing WorkCaring but Inconsistent
  • , and writing support.
  • The biggest repeated issue is slow communication and .
  • Online reviews .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A is realistic if students keep up with , and drafts, but it is not always effortless.

Online reviews more directly call the class easy, while as earned through steady work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The writing work is manageable and often broken into parts, but , and .

Online sections sound more straightforward, while and lecture clarity.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and online reviews marking it mandatory and some saying it was not required.

Both formats include mandatory and non-mandatory reports, so flexibility is inconsistent.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students recommend her for care and feedback, but communication problems and .

In-person recommendations are stronger, while online recommendations are split by organization and responsiveness.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Many students report fair grading, late-work flexibility, and achievable A .

Format shift

and late work more often, while in-person reviews are more mixed.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, and drafts, but students often call it doable when managed well.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly discussions and papers, while , and attendance.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is often described as caring and helpful with writing, but recurring disorganization and slow communication lower the score.

Format shift

, while online teaching suffers from weaker communication.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades appear driven mostly by essays, writing assignments, discussions, presentations, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments, with and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students more often praise her as caring, engaging, and , though some still report disorganization.

Main concern

Attendance and steady essay work matter, and .

What students said

“She cares for her students.”
EGL101
“All over the place. and .”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe easy assignments and , but several complain about poor communication and .

Main concern

and weak email response can leave students unsure where they stand.

What students said

“Doesn't respond to emails to much and so you wont know what your grade is until last minute.”
EGL101
“Easy class just keep up with the work.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and presentations, but they do not clearly prove strict proctoring or .

Essay-Based MidtermEssay-Based FinalPresentationWriting Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

In-Class MidtermIn-Class FinalEssays
“4 essays, 2 in class ( .”
EGL101

Online

Online reviews mention assignments, discussions, presentations, and recorded slides, but .

Weekly DiscussionsPresentationWriting Assignments
“1discussion post a week with 2 replies and end of semester 1 presentation with slides”
ENGL235

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's knowledgeable and encouraging but sometimes inconsistent.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ !”

⚠️ Communication Risk

48/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Path

78/100

“If you keep up with the work, she is an easy A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She cares for her students.
  • She is one of the .
  • All over the place. and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you keep up with the work, she is an easy A
  • Can turn in late work for full credit.
  • She grades very harshly and does not give her students any grace.

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • Doesn't respond to emails to much and .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

103

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years and both formats, with , and communication.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 553
4 out of 517
3 out of 515
2 out of 58
1 out of 511

Course coverage

ENG10116 reviews
EGL10113 reviews
ENG0974 reviews
ENG1034 reviews
ENG0993 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ENGL1013 reviews
ENGLC10003 reviews
ANTH2101 review
ENG2351 review
ENGL2351 review
ENGLI0971 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 12 · A 11 · A- 3

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2