AI Rate Professor

Biology

Matthew Rainbow

BIOL101 · BIO101101LAB · BIO101L · BIO101 · BILOGY · BIO101LECTURE · BILOGY101 · 368 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
38.28%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you want intense biology practice and can handle strict participation, heavy workload, and memorization pressure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy WorkloadMemorization TestsMandatory ParticipationStrict And StressfulPassionate But Polarizing
  • Students repeatedly describe extreme , and frequent quizzes.
  • Teaching reviews are sharply polarized, with some praising deep learning but many calling the environment stressful or humiliating.
  • Even students who earn A grades often say the cost is high, so this is not an easy A course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible because of and clear memorization targets, but it , and stress tolerance.

The single online review also signals high effort, while major workload and memorization.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The biology content is not always described as conceptually impossible, but the course feels hard because of , and volume.

Both formats point to intense workload, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

Attendance and active attention are repeatedly described as mandatory, with students saying he calls people out and penalizes absence or tardiness.

In-person reviews provide nearly all attendance evidence, while the single .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most students warn against taking him unless they are highly motivated biology learners who can handle stress and heavy work.

The online sample is too small, while in-person reviews are polarized but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

exists, but students frequently report tough grading, unclear expectations, and stressful memorization-based scoring.

Format shift

, while the single online review does not provide enough grading detail.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Reviews repeatedly mention video , and heavy memorization.

Format shift

The workload concern appears in both formats, but and repeated evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some students call him passionate and knowledgeable, but many describe , and high stress.

Format shift

In-person evidence is strongly polarized and mostly negative, while the single online review gives limited neutral evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessment , and large poster or drawing projects.

Format shift

and quizzes, while online evidence only broadly mentions projects and workload.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews consistently describe a demanding, stressful class with , and mixed teaching value.

Main concern

The main risk is the combination of heavy workload, strict public participation, and memorization-based exams.

What students said

“ if you don't want to be stressing all semester.”
BIO101
“Awesome class with a passionate, knowledgeable professor who teaches clearly and makes the subject engaging.”
BIO101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review reports intense workload, hands-on projects, no note taking, and required engagement.

Main concern

Evidence is limited, but the workload appears intense even online.

What students said

“Prepare for intense workload and hands-on projects with this professor.”
BIO101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly described as memory-heavy, stressful, and based on diagrams, coloring, and timed recall.

Memorization MidtermsPoster-Based TestsVideo QuizzesOnline FinalStrict Timing

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe multiple memorization midterms, poster-style tests, video quizzes, and an Browser, or open-book policy.

Memorization MidtermsPoster TestsVideo QuizzesOnline Final
“There are usually 5 midterms that are all memorization based and for many it does not work out.”
BIO101
“3 memorization "midterms" (~1 week to study), weekly video quizzes, 80 question online final”
BIO101

Online

The single online review mentions intense workload and required engagement, but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Intense WorkloadHands-On Projects
“Prepare for intense workload and hands-on projects with this professor.”
BIO101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you don't want to be stressing all semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Workload Pressure

10/100

“He is very heavy on huge drawing super-projects, and gives lots of hour each and have usually 30 questions.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“He is truly passionate about biology but his teaching style isnt for most”

🧪

22/100

“ and coloring every little detail.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • The workload is HEAVY, but it's the first class where I truly felt like I learned a lot.
  • Be prepared for hour+ to do.
  • He lectures the entire class period and will call you out if he thinks you're not paying attention.

Theme 2

🧠 About Exams

  • All 5 midterms are memorization-based (emphasis: .
  • and writing from memory so be prepared to study.
  • The to memorize the images with the right color scheme and arrows.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He gave amazing lectures, and made the and easy to understand.
  • He loves to belittle and humiliate his students in the middle of class because of any mistake they make.
  • He is very passionate about biology and wants people to feel the same way as well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

368

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 50 reviews, mostly recent, with highly consistent evidence about , and polarized teaching.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 581
4 out of 574
3 out of 550
2 out of 576
1 out of 588

Course coverage

BIO10118 reviews
BILOGY10114 reviews
BIO101L6 reviews
1015 reviews
BIO101101LAB4 reviews
Show 3 more courses
BILOGY1 review
BIO101LECTURE1 review
BIOL1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 3 · A 15 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

9

C+ 5 · C 4

D range

6

D+ 4 · D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1