AI Rate Professor

Music

Elizabeth Fewtrell

202030963MUS101 · MUS101HONORS · MUSC101 · MUS101 · MUSIC101 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
86.11%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take her if you can tolerate lecture-heavy music content and will use study guides, , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra Credit HeavyCaring ProfessorLecture HeavyClear Study GuidesMostly Easy A
  • Most students , and .
  • The course is usually an easy A, but , and .
  • A minority of students report communication.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

The A is very reachable through study guides, , and basic effort, but , and occasional unclear instructions keep it from being automatic.

Online reviews highlight and open-note quizzes, while in-person , and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The content is usually manageable for a music appreciation class, but , and honors work add real effort.

Online reviews describe a lighter setup, while in-person reviews more , and listening portions.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

reviews saying attendance matters and some online reviews saying it was not mandatory.

Online attendance appears mixed and sometimes optional, while and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

87/100

, and clear study materials despite some complaints about lectures and communication.

Both formats are mostly recommended, but online reviews include a sharper communication complaint and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

, study guides, and flexible grading are common, but a .

Format shift

and one harsh grading complaint, while in-person evidence is mostly lenient with some test-heavy sections.

Workload

Light

78/100

Many students report and manageable assignments, though papers, discussions, tests, and coding-like workload are not relevant here.

Format shift

Online reviews often call the workload light, while , and lecture participation.

Teaching experience

Good

85/100

Most students find her caring, passionate, and helpful, but some describe lectures as boring or instructions as unclear.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly warm but includes communication issues, while and more consistently praises her care.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades usually mix quizzes, tests, papers, participation, discussion boards, and rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

, and , while in-person reviews mention listening exams, papers, presentations, study guides, and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews mostly praise her caring style, study guides, , and fair grading, while some students find lectures boring or .

Main concern

Lectures can be heavy or boring, and missing class can hurt test performance.

What students said

“All of her assignments were very easy as .”
MUS101
“Her study guides are literally the test.”
MUS101
“Her tone is very monotone so it's sometimes easy to get bored or distracted.”
MUS101

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive and describe , and , but one review reports poor communication and harsh zeros.

Main concern

Online students may struggle if instructions or .

What students said

“tons of and a light workload.”
MUS101
“The and she offers a ton of ”
MUS101
“She was unresponsive to emails and throws zeros at students.”
MUS101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are usually student-friendly because students cite open-note quizzes, strong study guides, , and .

Open-Note QuizzesStudy Guides Match TestsNo Final In Some SectionsListening ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and study guides, with some open-book or study-guide-friendly formats but no clearly proven proctoring policy.

Open Book/Open Note QuizzesStudy Guides Match TestsListening ExamsTerm Paper
“There were 8 multiple choice quizzes, open book/open note.”
MUS101
“Her study guides are literally the test.”
MUSIC101
“ .”
MUS101HONORS

Online

Online reviews support open-note quizzes and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Open-Note QuizzesNo Final In One Online ReviewNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The and she offers a ton of ”
MUS101
“There are many opportunities, a few papers and .”
MUS101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're only looking to take this class for a gen ed, then get this teacher. She genuinely cares about her students and , and there really isn't that much work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

85/100

“She genuinely cares about her students and , and there really isn't that much work.”

📈 Grade Value

88/100

“So much was offered, I passed with 110% even though I submitted one of the .”

⚖️

82/100

“There were 8 multiple choice quizzes, open book/open note. 2-3 .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Loved prof Fewtrell! She is very caring & all of her lectures were super interesting.
  • She is passionate about music and inspires others to explore their interest in music as well.
  • Lectures tend to be a bit on the boring side but other than that a great class for anyone interested in music and/or music history.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The and she offers a ton of
  • Her study guides are literally the test.
  • Easy A, do and study and it's an easy A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • She was unresponsive to emails and throws zeros at students.
  • Most of .
  • If you have a , if you just need a class to get by please do not take .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-six reviews across many years and both formats give rich, mostly consistent evidence with .

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MUS10128 reviews
MUS101HONORS3 reviews
MUSIC1013 reviews
202030963MUS1011 review
MUSC1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

22

A+ 15 · A 5 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3