AI Rate Professor

English

Ronda Nogales

72903ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENG102 · ENG103 · ENG100A · ENGLISH101 · ENG101 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
35.9%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can handle a writing-heavy class with strict expectations and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy writing workloadTough gradingHelpful feedback when engagedStrict attendanceMixed teaching experience
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who value her feedback and students .
  • The class , and timely submission.
  • Recent reviews are more positive than many older reviews, but workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible with steady work and some students mention leniency or , but and heavy essays.

Online evidence includes both A grades and severe complaints, while and workload.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The writing content is not always conceptually hard, but the , and specific essay expectations make the class demanding.

Online students describe manageable essays but self-directed learning, while and reading load.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and preparation can hurt students badly.

Both formats include mandatory-attendance evidence, with in-person reviews adding stricter consequences for being unprepared.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendations are split because some students credit her with improving their writing while many and workload.

Online recommendations are especially polarized, while strong praise and strong avoidance warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Some recent students call her flexible or generous, but repeated complaints about tough, unclear, or .

Format shift

Online reviews mention both generosity and unexplained negative grading, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and assignments that can pile up.

Format shift

Online reviews call the class assignment-heavy, while and readings.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Her teaching is praised as caring and feedback-rich by some students, but many others describe unclear explanations, poor organization, or negative classroom experiences.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is mixed and sometimes self-directed, while severe frustration.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Most evidence , and papers rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show strong disagreement, with praise for feedback and improvement but many , and strict class control.

Main concern

The main risk is heavy work with as tough or unclear.

What students said

“Definitely not a class for the weak, about 4-5 essays within 8 weeks, plus the daily work.”
ENG101
“She takes pride in not giving A's.”
ENG101
“You will become a .”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with and manageable essays while others criticize organization, access, and vague teaching.

Main concern

Students may need to manage deadlines and learning independently because support is inconsistent.

What students said

“ .”
ENG101
“A lot of the learning is by yourself.”
ENG103
“More than half the class failed due to her teaching capabilities.”
ENG102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, but assessment appears mostly essay and in-class writing.

Essay-Based AssessmentIn-Class Writing MentionedTests Mentioned But Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove closed-book exams, proctoring, or a consistent final format.

In-Class WritingTests Mentioned
“There are 2 in class writing assignments.”
ENG101
“ ”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, take-home, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Definitely not a class for the weak, about 4-5 essays within 8 weeks, plus the daily work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“You will become a .”

⚖️

34/100

“She takes pride in not giving A's.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Lots and lots and lots and lots of homework!”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She will help you become an excellent writer I promise you that.
  • Very vague and .
  • She provides so many resources and doesn't want to see anyone fail.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

  • As long as your on top of it and turn in easy A.
  • She grades a little harsh but overall I found this class easy & enjoyable.
  • She gives a lot of what she wants in a essay.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • .
  • .
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 39 reviews span many years, include detailed comments, and show consistent themes despite polarized opinions.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 517

Course coverage

ENG10121 reviews
ENGL1017 reviews
ENG1023 reviews
ENGLISH1013 reviews
ENG100A2 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENG1032 reviews
72903ENG1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 1 · A 8 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 3 · B 8

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2