AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Brian Shreves

AJNARC · NARCOTICSCONTR · NARCOADMI · NARCO205 · AJ101 · AJ203 · AJ206 · AJ204 · NARC101 · NARCO · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you want an , and engaging AJ class that still feels useful for real learning.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AClear gradingExtra creditEngaging lecturesReal-world expertise
  • Students consistently describe him as an excellent, funny, knowledgeable, and highly recommended AJ professor.
  • Grades are very attainable because , and appears often.
  • Online classes are structured and easy to follow, while , and open-note quiz evidence.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Students repeatedly call the class an easy A, especially when they participate, read, submit work, and use .

Both formats strongly support Easy A, with online reviews stressing clear structure and .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

89/100

Students say the material is easy to follow, practical, and engaging, though some reading and code-section study can matter.

Online reviews emphasize easy structure, while and practical explanations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory, and comments repeatedly connect success with showing up or participating.

Online reviews often require weekly participation, while and paying attention.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

99/100

Students strongly recommend him because the , and taught by someone with real experience.

Both online and in-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

94/100

, clear , and repeated Easy A comments show very generous grading.

Format shift

Online reviews highlight and clear criteria, while and resubmission evidence.

Workload

Light

84/100

The workload is usually described as manageable or light, with , and one larger project in some classes.

Format shift

Online workload is structured weekly, while as little work or one main project.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently praise his clarity, humor, real-world law enforcement knowledge, helpfulness, and engaging lectures.

Format shift

Online reviews praise organization and help, while , and field expertise.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment includes , and participation rather than one dominant method.

Format shift

Online reviews describe weekly assignments and quizzes, while , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise his humor, field , and student-friendly quizzes.

Main concern

Attendance and participation often matter, and students still need to study slides, complete the Narco book, or keep up with assignments.

What students said

“Overall easy class if you participate and complete the little work he ask you for.”
NARC101
“great lectures never boring easy A if you show up and open book”
AJ203
“Gives PowerPoint lectures, . .”
AJ203

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online students describe clear instructions, , and strong organization.

Main concern

, and deadlines still require steady follow-through.

What students said

“This class was such a great and .”
AJ203
“Very easy to pass and I loved his PowerPoints I definitely feel like I learned a lot.”
AJ203
“ and there was not too much work.”
AJ101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly overall because , while online reviews do not prove strict proctoring.

Open Book QuizzesOpen Note TestsMidtermFinalStudy SlidesQuizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention open-book or open-note quizzes and tests, with midterms and finals treated as more standard.

Open Book QuizzesOpen Note TestsMidtermFinalOpen Notes Not Final
“ ”
AJ203
“Nail the !”
NARC101
“Gives .”
AJ203

Online

, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

QuizzesMidtermFinal
“There are 12 discussions (one a week), 6 journal assignments (chapter key terms), 5 quizzes, a midterm, and a final.”
AJ101
“Each week, we had to read a chapter, participate in the discussion board, complete the journal assignment, work on the , and .”
AJ203

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly one of the greatest teachers at AVC he's so open and understanding !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“He truly wants his students to succeed and takes the .”

📈 Easy A Signal

94/100

“Easy A class.”

⚖️

94/100

“One main assignment broken down through semester, plenty of time if needed and still get full credit.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and the coursework is manageable.
  • Great professor! Very knowledgeable in course content.
  • He will make you roll laughing but still teach you what you need to know.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class, if you show up and pay attention you will pass with no problem.
  • A very easy class the professor is awesome!
  • Very easy course.

Theme 3

📝

  • .
  • Gives PowerPoint lectures, . .
  • There are 12 discussions (one a week), 6 journal assignments (chapter key terms), 5 quizzes, a midterm, and a final.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across online and in-person formats are highly consistent, detailed, and strongly positive, though .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 553
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AJ20319 reviews
AJ10118 reviews
NARCO3 reviews
1012 reviews
733811 review
Show 7 more courses
AJ2041 review
AJ2061 review
AJNARC1 review
NARC1011 review
NARCO2051 review
NARCOADMI1 review
NARCOTICSCONTR1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 7 · A 15 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2