AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tooraj Gordi

ALGEBRA70 · MATH220 · MATH110 · MATH140 · MATH130 · MATH70 · MATH125 · MATH060 · MATH102 · MAT102 · MATH135 · MATH150 · MATHMATH · MATH115 · MATH160 · MATH148 · 102 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
37.14%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take him only if you are strong in , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderPop quizzesConfusing lecturesHeavy testsSelf-teaching needed
  • Students report a sharp split between caring or passionate moments and .
  • Getting an A , and tolerance for pop quizzes or curveball tests.
  • Lower-level classes can feel manageable, but calculus and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible, but students , and surviving tough quizzes or tests.

Online and in-person reviews giving more severe warnings.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math content is often described as fast, abstract, and harder than the lectures prepare students for.

Online reviews call the class challenging, while calculus, trig, and test-heavy courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory and mention pop quizzes, classwork, or participation tied to showing up.

Online has mixed attendance reports, but as important or required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

37/100

and help, but many warn against him because grading and tests feel unfair.

Online reviews are mostly negative, while but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students often report tough grading, no partial credit, strict work requirements, and tests beyond covered material.

Format shift

Online reviews mention zero credit for missing work steps, while and low pass confidence.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Workload is not always huge, but , and test prep often feel heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize tricky homework, while , and .

Teaching experience

Poor

41/100

He is sometimes praised as passionate and helpful, but many students describe , mistakes, and .

Format shift

Online evidence is more negative, while and strong frustration.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews frequently mention quizzes, tests, finals, and as preparation or .

Format shift

Both formats mention quizzes and finals and frequent quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, with some students praising his passion and others warning strongly against taking him.

Main concern

The main risk is confusing instruction combined with , and little partial credit.

What students said

“ if you want an A.”
MATH160
“Honestly a really easy and interesting math class.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with , and strict work-showing expectations.

Main concern

Online students still describe tricky work and .

What students said

“This class is a real challenge, but tools like unstuckstudy and the free textbook can help you get through it.”
MATH140
“if you don't show your work even for mental math you get zero credit.”
MATH140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules, but they do show frequent, difficult, and .

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyNo Clear Open-Book EvidenceStrict Work Showing

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove closed-book policy, but , and curveball exam content.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyHard FinalCurveball Tests
“ and tough, and the .”
MATH110
“Tests and .”
MATH148

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy, but and strict work showing.

Strict Work ShowingNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceNo Clear Open-Book Evidence
“if you don't show your work even for mental math you get zero credit.”
MATH140
“ .”
MATH140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

41/100

“Really good teacher. Emphasizes the work you must put in to learn but is inspiring to students and always ready to help.”

⚖️

24/100

“The quizzes and X Factors are not similar to the book or what he teaches you.”

👍 Recommendation Level

37/100

“I would not suggest this class to anyone, even math majors.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • but had a strong accent, making lectures .
  • Really good teacher.
  • The work was quite easy but .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you want an A.
  • Very Hard.
  • no partial credit whatsoever.

Theme 3

📝

  • and tough, and the .
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

102

Lifetime ratings

89/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years, with , and teaching style.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 517
3 out of 516
2 out of 519
1 out of 529

Course coverage

MATH1407 reviews
MATH707 reviews
MATH1106 reviews
MATH1025 reviews
MATH1505 reviews
Show 12 more courses
MATH1604 reviews
MATH1353 reviews
MATH1483 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
309321 review
ALGEBRA701 review
MAT1021 review
MATH0601 review
MATH1151 review
MATH1301 review
MATH2201 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

13

Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5