AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lyudmila Michael

MATH130 · MATH140 · MATH128 · MATHMATH · MATH135 · MATH150 · MATH102 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
52.63%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can handle fast lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but polarizingExtra creditTest retakesFast lecturesHomework heavy
  • many students love her support, while others .
  • Grades can be forgiving because of , and retakes.
  • Lecture clarity is the main risk, especially when the pace and accent make math harder to follow.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A is realistic because of , and forgiving test policies, but students still need homework and practice.

, while online evidence is too limited and mixed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The math content is not always hard by itself, but fast lectures and .

and confusion complaints, while online reviews are split between helpful and self-taught experiences.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Many reviews mark attendance mandatory or say missing class makes catching up difficult.

, while online evidence is limited but includes one mandatory report.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

57/100

, and retakes, but avoid her if they need slow, clear lectures.

In-person reviews are mixed but often positive, while the two online reviews directly conflict.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

, and grade help make grading more forgiving than average.

Format shift

The strongest ; online comments mainly mention online homework.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students frequently mention lots of , and steady practice demands.

Format shift

Both formats mention online homework, but workload.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

She is caring and helpful, but lecture clarity varies sharply and several students say they had to teach themselves.

Format shift

, while online feedback is too small and split.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and study guides are central, with and points.

Format shift

and quizzes, while online reviews emphasize homework websites and lecture notes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but lean positive, with many praising her care, , and retakes while .

Main concern

Students who struggle with and .

What students said

“She allows you to use your notes and formulas for tests, and the !”
MATH150
“she overcomplicates the to learn.”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online evidence is split, with one strong recommendation and one strong warning about prerecorded lectures.

Main concern

Online lecture clarity may be a serious risk for some students.

What students said

“ .”
MATH150
“Basically taught myself in the course.”
MATH128

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Several reviews describe student-friendly exams with notes, formulas, retakes, , and , though not every class confirms the same policy.

Open NotesFormula Use AllowedTest RetakesExtra CreditTake-Home Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly support open notes, formula use, retakes, , and .

Open NotesFormula Use AllowedTest RetakesTake-Home TestsExtra Credit
“She allows you to use your notes and formulas for tests, and the !”
MATH150
“ALLOWS you to RETEST for a higher score.”
140
“ ”
MATH130

Online

Online reviews mention homework through Cengage or a website, but .

Online Homework
“HW is online through Cengage and no textbook required.”
MATH150
“ , as it is graded quickly.”
MATH128

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She allows you to use your notes and formulas for tests, and the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“I had to what she was teaching after each class.”

⚖️

82/100

“She lets you use formulas AND .”

👍 Recommendation Fit

57/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • she overcomplicates the to learn.
  • Basically taught myself in the course.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Exams

  • She allows you to use your notes and formulas for tests, and the !
  • The , and they're open notes.
  • Allows students to use formulas as well as .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • The hw can be a lot if you are balancing a job like how I was.
  • A lot of homework but just space out time for it.
  • The only thing is that she gives a lot of homework, but over-all very great and helpful.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-six reviews across many years give rich but mixed evidence, with , and lecture clarity risks.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH10216 reviews
MATH1507 reviews
MATH1405 reviews
MATH1302 reviews
MATH1352 reviews
Show 4 more courses
1021 review
1401 review
MATH1281 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2