AI Rate Professor

History

Lukas Gunderson

HIST104 · HIST105 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

He is a strong choice online if you can keep up with lectures and structured writing work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesManageable workloadFast email repliesHelpful feedbackPaper grading picky
  • , and responsive help.
  • The course is not effortless because lectures, papers, and study guides still require steady attention.
  • The only in-person review is much less positive and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

A grades are common and appears once, but , and weekly steps still require consistent work.

Online reviews show a fair path to strong grades, while the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The workload is manageable, but , and some unclear instructions keep it from being truly easy.

Online evidence is more manageable overall, while the but .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

72/100

as not mandatory, but one online review lists it as mandatory.

Online attendance varies across reviews, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend him for , and useful structure.

Online reviews are strongly positive, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

Grades are generally strong and is mentioned, but one student describes strict and .

Format shift

Online grading looks fair and supportive, while .

Workload

Light

76/100

Students describe , and about two hours of lecture videos per week.

Format shift

Online workload is clearly manageable, while broadly.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students praise , and good structure, despite one negative in-person writing-feedback review.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is strong, while the .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and tests rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize homework, lectures, and term paper steps, while and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single in-person review says lectures and but and restrictive.

Main concern

.

What students said

“ ”
HIST105
“he is picky about passive language in papers”
HIST105

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are highly positive, with , and no textbook in most cases.

Main concern

and lecture-heavy material can still feel .

What students said

“Easy to understand and a very manageable workload.”
HIST105
“Interesting lectures and .”
HIST104
“ , but he answered emails quickly.”
HIST105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and study guides, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Tests Not ComplicatedStudy Guide HelpfulNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The single in-person review says tests were not complicated, but .

Tests Not Complicated
“ ”
HIST105

Online

and lecture notes, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Study Guide HelpfulLecture-Based Exam PrepNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“make a study guide and write down all the words you hear him present as it will be very useful on the exams.”
HIST105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy to understand and a very manageable workload.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Loved Mr. Gunderson very forgiving and to understand and not drawn out”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“Overall great teacher loved taking his class.”

⚖️

66/100

“he is picky about passive language in papers”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Interesting lectures and .
  • Loved Mr. Gunderson very forgiving and to understand and not drawn out
  • Easy to understand and a very manageable workload.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • The term paper had many weekly steps leading up to the .
  • Most of the work was just listening to 2 hours of lectures a week (videos, not live) and asking questions about them.
  • but still had you think on the material.

Theme 3

📝

  • he is picky about passive language in papers
  • , but he answered emails quickly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses five recent reviews with consistent online praise, but .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST1054 reviews
HIST1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 2 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values