AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Michael Lyudmila

MATHALL · MATH140 · MATH050 · MATH128 · MATH150 · MATH102 · MATH · MATH50 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a supportive math professor with strong grade support and can handle an accent.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringExtra CreditEasy Math ClassHeavy AccentLots of Homework
  • Most students describe her as caring, helpful, and easy to pass if you keep up.
  • Grades are often , and forgiving policies.
  • The main risk is a heavy accent, lecture-heavy classes, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

87/100

Getting an A looks very realistic because students cite , and , though some still need steady homework effort.

Online evidence is limited but supportive, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The math content is usually described as straightforward and beginner-friendly, but accents, skipped steps, and .

The online review praises accommodation but not content ease, while as easy and straightforward.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Attendance is often not mandatory in newer reviews, but as required or important.

The , while in-person evidence varies by term.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend her because , and makes math passable.

Both formats are positive, but the recommendation signal .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students repeatedly mention , retakes, forgiving treatment, and many A grades.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions accommodation and extra credit, while , and easy passing.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but many reviews tag or mention lots of .

Format shift

The online review mentions extended homework deadlines, while .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

She is widely described as caring, helpful, and as the main teaching weakness.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive but thin, while and mostly favorable.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and tests rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online evidence does not clearly define assessment weights, while , and retakes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, with repeated praise for help, , easy passing, and caring support.

Main concern

Several students mention a heavy accent and some report lots of .

What students said

“Free class, Homework was easy and the my future classes.”
MATH
“She has a heavy Russian accent and is difficult to understand.”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is positive and emphasizes accommodation, , and .

Main concern

The online evidence is limited to one older summer review.

What students said

“Professor Lyudmila was very accommodating and even extended some of fault.”
MATH128

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

or makeup support, but some in-person reviews report heavy or uneven testing.

Easy FinalRetake TestsMultiple MidtermsTest Heavy Risk

Assessment risk

Standard

66/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention an , and one concern about uncovered material on tests.

Easy FinalRetake TestsMultiple MidtermsUncovered Material Risk
“ and the my future classes.”
MATH
“ if you need to.”
MATH102
“She likes and puts uncovered material on tests.”
MATH150

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor is so easy and it's such a great class for 150. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Perfect balance of showing you the material and allowing you to solve the problem by yourself.”

📈 Grade Support

90/100

“She gives easy .”

⚠️ Main Risk

48/100

“She has a heavy Russian accent and is difficult to understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She makes sure everyone understands the material.
  • Her accent can make things harder to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and the .
  • and other assignments.
  • I got an A, but held on to it for dear life.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 17 reviews across many years with consistent themes about caring support, easy passing, , and accent concerns.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1026 reviews
MATH1503 reviews
MATH2 reviews
MATH1402 reviews
MATH0501 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH1281 review
MATH501 review
MATHALL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values