AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hal Huntsman

MATH115 · MATH150 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
70.59%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a supportive math teacher and are ready for and participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring teacherLots of homeworkGroup workGood feedbackFlexible late work
  • Most , and support.
  • The and frequent participation.
  • Grades can be strong when students keep up with assignments and group work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many students earn A grades, but the A usually comes from keeping up with , and participation rather than low effort.

Online evidence includes one open-note test comment, while in-person evidence more strongly and participation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The math content is manageable with support, but students say it challenges how they think and requires steady practice.

Both formats describe helpful teaching, but and conceptual challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as mandatory, while others say it is not required or not clearly stated.

Online evidence is mixed, and in-person evidence also varies by course and term.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend him because he is caring and .

Online reviews are more polarized, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students mention , and late-work flexibility, but also tough grading in some sections.

Format shift

Online reviews conflict between tough grading and open-note support, while and flexibility.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

calling the amount overwhelming.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy homework, with .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews describe him as patient, caring, helpful, and strong at explaining math.

Format shift

Both formats include strong praise, but online reviews include one severe negative review.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades , and participation.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions homework and tests, while and group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, but students , and participation demands.

Main concern

Students who dislike group work or .

What students said

“There was so .”
MATH115
“Lots of homework, but does not have penalty for ”
MATH150
“You MUST talk to people everyday.”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split, praising helpful lectures and open-note tests but and .

Main concern

The online workload can feel intense if you fall behind.

What students said

“Lectures and .”
MATH115
“be prepared for insane amounts of homework.”
MATH115
“ ”
MATH150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but generally student-friendly where students mention open notes, reference sheets, and partner quizzes.

Open Notes Mentioned OnlineReference Sheets Mentioned In PersonPartner Quizzes MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, partner quizzes, and large reference sheets, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Partner QuizzesReference SheetsMany Quizzes And Tests
“Lets you have a reference sheet for quizzes and .”
MATH115
“he allows on quizzes (which aren't hard) to work with a partner”
MATH115
“have references sheets of ANY SIZE”
MATH115

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention open-note tests in one course, and reviews do not clearly prove webcam or proctoring rules.

Open NotesZoom Breakout RoomsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ ”
MATH150
“participate in zoom breakout rooms”
MATH150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Mr. Huntsman is the and I have ever had.”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Tons of work this guy assigned.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“The . I highly recommend his math115.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really cares about his students and is inclusive in his teaching style(s) to meet student needs.
  • Lectures and .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • They all did help me to get an A though.
  • Do your hw its worth a lot for your grade in the class & do well on the projects.
  • Lots of homework, but does not have penalty for !

Theme 3

🤝 About Class Fit

  • You MUST talk to people everyday.
  • the constant group work was always a hit or miss.
  • If you prefer working alone or staying quiet, this is not the class for you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

There are 17 recent reviews with consistent patterns , and mixed fit.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH11514 reviews
MATH1503 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 6

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1