AI Rate Professor

English

Lisa Shabazian

ENGL101 · READ099 · ENGLISH101 · READING99 · READ99 · ENG101 · ENG70583 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
97.73%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a supportive English class and can keep up with , and essays.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious and caringParticipation mattersStrong writing feedbackReading and essaysMostly fair but demanding
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as funny, caring, and highly engaging.
  • The , and steady writing work.
  • Grades are reachable, but essays and missed in-class work can hurt students who fall behind.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is very reachable, but students must attend, participate, read, and .

Both formats show strong outcomes, while and participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course is approachable because she explains clearly, but reading, essays, and class.

Online reviews mention several essays, while and live discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because participation and in-class work affect grades.

Both online reviews mark attendance as mandatory, and important.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students almost universally recommend her because , and helpful with writing.

Both online and from the 42 in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grades are generally fair with and feedback, but and late work may not be accepted.

Format shift

Online reviews show good results with essays, while and tough-grader warnings.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The , and several essays, but students rarely call it overwhelming.

Format shift

Online reviews mention 4 or 5 essays, and , and discussion.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students repeatedly , and engaging across many years of reviews.

Format shift

Both formats praise her teaching, while and more consistent support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, reading, participation, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention essay questions for the final, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are extremely positive and consistently , and engaging lectures.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“She is a very good teacher and creates a comfortable/safe class environment 4all.”
ENG101
“If you don't show or say anything you will have a hard time.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews praise her Canvas use, humor, support, and , but and participation.

Main concern

Online students still and participate in discussions.

What students said

“In total, you will have 4 or 5 essays.”
ENGLISH101
“Professor Shabazian was a pro at online teaching.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show essay-based finals and some chapter tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, or strict proctoring.

Essay-Based FinalWriting AssignmentsChapter Tests Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essay-heavy work, but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or strict proctoring.

Chapter TestsEssay Work
“ but make sure you read and study for .”
READ099

Online

and a civics paper, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Essay QuestionsCivics Paper
“For the and a civics paper.”
ENGLISH101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is truly the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“She is truly the class.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ if I could.”

⚖️

68/100

“She is a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was AMAZING; so , and caring.
  • She makes the lectures both entertaining and educational.
  • The entire atmosphere of her classroom is just amazing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you don't show or say anything you will have a hard time.
  • The and intense, but good overall.
  • Her course is challenging but doable .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She .
  • She wants each and every student to pass and makes sure she does whatever she can.
  • She is always willing to assist you and keep you interested in the discussion.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 44 reviews span several years, opinions are very consistent, and many comments give , and workload.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 542
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG10126 reviews
ENGL1018 reviews
READ0994 reviews
ENGLISH1012 reviews
READ992 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENG705831 review
READING991 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

21

A+ 4 · A 14 · A- 3

B range

12

B+ 5 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Audit/No Grade 3 · Not sure yet 3