AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Iogar Marder

MATH070 · MATH3 · MA70 · MATH70 · MATH050 · MA50 · MATH060 · MATRH50 · MATH102 · MATH60 · MATH50 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want to learn math and will stay active, but if you need a very gentle or highly guided style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear when engagedHomework reinforces learningAccent concernsPolarizing styleStrong for proactive students
  • and say he helps them understand.
  • Several negative reviews mention accent, skipped steps, rudeness, or .
  • , and keep up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students say the class is passable with , and attention, but weak math students may struggle badly.

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Many students say he makes math understandable, but , and .

Only in-person evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, and many older comments say class attendance and notes are important for success.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, but repeated concerns about communication and harsh moments lower the score.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades are not well documented, but comments suggest students can pass by doing the work while .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

but sometimes heavy, with one review describing an extreme workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

79/100

and care for learning, but several students found him confusing, rude, or hard to understand.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention homework, chapter tests, midterms, finals, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, but the experience varies sharply depending on math background and tolerance for his style.

Main concern

Some students struggled with his accent, pace, sarcasm, and .

What students said

“ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!”
MATH60
“However, if you're not very good at math, dont take his .”
MATH60
“I have ended up with over 360 homework problems in one week.”
MATH102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam comments suggest standard tests tied to lectures or study guides, but .

Tests based on lectureFinal from study guideExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove book policy or .

Tests based on lectureFinal from study guide
“the ”
MATH102
“ but .”
MATH102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want to actually learn math. ”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and student fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

79/100

“ easily understood.”

📈 Difficulty And Effort

68/100

“Pay attention and put in the study time and you'll breeze right through(:”

⚠️ Main Risk

48/100

“if you're not very good at math, dont take his .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • easily understood.
  • Teaches until you understand it.
  • !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Homework was super easy, and the
  • Pay attention and put in the study time and you'll breeze right through(:
  • I have ended up with over 360 homework problems in one week.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • A little hard to understand sometimes with accent.
  • Degrades students!
  • he skips steps and it will leave you lost early on.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 33 in-person reviews across many years with detailed and repeated themes, though many are old.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH609 reviews
MATH1026 reviews
MATH706 reviews
MATH0602 reviews
MATH0702 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH502 reviews
2012601 review
MA501 review
MA701 review
MATH0501 review
MATH31 review
MATRH501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1