AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

John Asatryan

MATH070 · MATH110 · MATH50 · MATH65AND70 · MATH70 · MATH050 · MATH060 · MATH120 · MATH135 · MATH215 · MATH102 · MATH60 · MATH65 · 63 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
36.36%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can handle a sarcastic, demanding classroom style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDemeaning toneSelf-teaching requiredHeavy homeworkMixed clarityLenient pockets
  • Reviews are deeply split, but many students report feeling belittled or discouraged.
  • Several students say they had to teach themselves because lectures missed or rushed concepts.
  • Some students praise his care, humor, , and leniency when they can tolerate his style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students mention , and leniency, but many say the workload and self-teaching cost are high.

The in-person evidence is mixed and detailed; the single .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The math content can be manageable, but and assumed background make it feel harder.

; online evidence only supports poor lecture focus.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many reviews mark attendance mandatory or warn that skipping class will hurt students.

; the online review does not clearly establish attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

The low recommendation rate is driven by repeated complaints about sarcasm, discouragement, and .

Both formats include negative recommendation signals, with much broader in-person evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There are signs of , curves, and lenient quizzes, but and harsh classroom feedback offset them.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and hours of self-study.

Format shift

Heavy workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Positive reviews cite care and humor, but , and discouraging treatment.

Format shift

The online review is negative, and in-person reviews are highly polarized but often critical.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and class participation.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized, with many , and heavy workload.

Main concern

Students often say questions are met with sarcasm or dismissal.

What students said

“He WILL belittle you.”
MATH070
“I had to spend hours and hours teaching myself concepts he didn't cover enough in class.”
MATH110
“He's great if you do the work”
MATH070

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is highly negative and says lectures drift away from the course.

Main concern

The review says he rambles and discourages students.

What students said

“He rambles off about his life during lectures rather than the course itself.”
MATH070

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed, with some student-friendly notes or calculators but .

TestsNotes Allowed In One ReviewCalculators Allowed At TimesReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and limited student-friendly allowances, but do not prove a .

TestsNotes AllowedCalculators Allowed At Times
“allowed us to ”
MATH215
“ ”
MATH65AND70
“So many assignments and tests as well.”
MATH110

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, open-book policy, webcam use, or proctoring.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I had to spend hours and hours teaching myself concepts he didn't cover enough in class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom tone. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“He only teaches what he feels necessary and poorly at that.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

36/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“A LOT of homework and it's completely online.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He constantly rambles on and on about off topic matters.
  • He always says "you should already know this" about EVERYTHING.
  • He cares about the subject and students a lot and will do SO MUCH to help you pass.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you have the time.
  • He offers and grades on a curve.
  • Gotta study hard daynight every second you get for a good grade.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • He WILL belittle you.
  • He makes you feel like crap.
  • He is very sarcastic and knows how to put his students down.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

63

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews span many years and show consistent recurring themes despite strong polarization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 59
3 out of 55
2 out of 517
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH07015 reviews
MATH706 reviews
MATH0605 reviews
MATH605 reviews
MATH504 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH0502 reviews
MATH1022 reviews
MATH1352 reviews
MATH652 reviews
0701 review
354831 review
757671 review
MATH1101 review
MATH1201 review
MATH2151 review
MATH65AND701 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Pass 1 · Rather not say 1